Rohit De July 18, 2004
#17 Posted by Dalit on July 18, 2004 10:28:29 pm
THE dalit or ``Untouchable`` is a government servant, the teacher in a state school, a politician. He is generally never a member of the higher judiciary, an eminent lawyer, industrialist or journalist. His freedom operates in designated enclaves: in politics and in the administrative posts he acquires because of state policy. But in areas of contemporary social exchange and culture, his ``Untouchability`` becomes his only definition. The right to pray to a Hindu god has always been a high caste privilege. Intricacy of religious ritual is directly proportionate to social status. The dalit has been formally excluded from religion, from education, and is a pariah in the entire sanctified universe of the ``dvija.``
Unlike racial minorities, the dalit is physically indistinguishable from upper castes, yet metaphorically and literally, the dalit has been a ``shitbearer`` for three millennia, toiling at the very bottom of the Hindu caste hierarchy. The word ``pariah`` itself comes from a dalit caste of southern India, the paRaiyar, ``those of the drum`` (paRai) or the ``leather people`` (Dumont, 1980: 54).
At 150 million, dalits or ``scheduled castes`` and ``scheduled tribes,`` form about 20 percent of India`s population (Census of India, 1991). Backward castes as a whole, taking dalits, tribes, and Other Backward Castes (OBCs) into consideration, form about 52 percent of India`s population. Today, wide-ranging policies on affirmative action have opened up government service and state education to dalits. But areas of freedom are limited, largely to sectors that are under the aegis of the state, such as the civil service or state-owned enterprises. Exclusion from cultural and social networks emerges from the dalit`s crucial exclusion from the system of castes (Mendelsohn and Vicziany, 1998: 39).
The dalit`s pariah status derives its strength and justification from religious texts. In the Manusmriti, (3) the dalit is described as ``polluted,`` in the same way as a menstruating woman, a widow, or a person who has recently been bereaved is polluted. The dalit is ``unclean`` from birth. He violates, by his very existence, the brahminical obsession with hygiene (Dumont, 1980: 131). While the ``untouchability`` of the menstruating woman or the bereaved is temporary and he or she can escape the Untouchable condition after the period of ``pollution`` is past, the dalit can never escape his status: he is perpetually filthy.
In a hymn from the Purusasukta of the Rg Veda, the dvija are said to have been born from elevated parts of the body of the supreme being. The dalit is the ``unborn,`` with no physical link with the supreme being. According to this hymn, from the body of Brahma come the four main categories of Hindu society, namely the four varnas (colors or castes): (5) brahmins (priests), kshatriyas (warriors), vaishyas (businessmen), and shudras (servants). The priest is born from the mouth of the Creator, the warrior from the arm, the businessman from the stomach, and the servant from the foot. Untouchables are born from outside the body of the Creator, almost a different species from Brahma`s children. Their entry into the divine body would be as unthinkable as the entry of an animal.
Today, the literary and scholarly efflorescence among dalits is set apart from caste Hindu society as a particularly dalit development. Dalit critiques of nation and society barely impinge on upper-caste notions of the social order, of the nation-state, and of modernity in general. The reasons for this are often attributed to the grafting of traditional caste networks onto modern state institutions--for example, the upper-caste seizures of Western education and the higher bureaucracy. The slide of the independent Indian nation-state into a landscape dominated by the brahminical upper castes has meant that new ways have been found to effectively seal the dalit in his ``democratic`` prison (Nigam, 2000).
As a result of legally reserved quotas in government and in state educational institutions, sections of dalits have emerged from agricultural poverty to become middle class. Yet the waters of modern opportunity flow along the fields of the upper castes, which were the main beneficiaries of the professional opportunities provided by colonialism and which also stand to gain the benefits of contemporary globalization, such as opportunities in the Information Technology industry or in the private sector. Thus, while dalit political importance and militancy rises, at the same time the dalit remains segregated from caste Hindu society by the invisible arms of caste.
The word ``dalit`` or ``crushed underfoot`` or ``broken into pieces`` is the contemporary version of the word ``Untouchable.`` ``Dalit`` owes its genesis to the nineteenth-century writings of Jotirao Govindrao Phule as well as to the literature of the Dalit Panthers, a political group formed in 1972 in the state of Maharashtra. British colonial census takers grouped together all those communities` neighbors considered ``polluted`` and called them ``Untouchable.`` ``harijan`` or ``children of god`` was Mahatma Gandhi`s name for dalits. The word ``Untouchable`` is sometimes still used, but ``harijan`` is seen as an equivalent of ``Uncle Tom,`` a paternalistic and condescending categorization of a group doomed to remain in perpetual bondage. Dalit leader Bhaurao Gaikwad observed in 1935 that ``It is no use only giving Untouchables a sweet name. Something practical should be done to ameliorate their conditions`` (Moon, 1987, vol. 4: 230). Today most Untouchable castes would prefer to use the term ``dalit`` as an identity of assertion. The UN Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance held in Durban, South Africa, in September 2001 equated ``racism`` with ``casteism``; although this parallel has been systematically criticized, the word ``dalit`` has been interpreted by some activists as equivalent to ``Black.``
Dalits are the main targets of what are termed ``caste-related crimes`. Over 2000 dalits died in the three years between 1989 and 1991 as a result of``atrocities against harijans`` (Memorandum of Dalit Writers Forum, 1996: 9). In the rural countryside, stripping, hacking to death, massacres and lopping off heads are the marks of a horrific bestiality inspired by the unshakeable taint of dirtiness. The dalit body, powerful, suppressed, and perennially dirty from such tasks as removal of dead cattle and waste, tanning, or toddy tapping (collecting juice from the bud of palm tree flowers) is to be violently exorcised, ritually cleansed, from the pure ``Aryan`` body of the Hindu caste system.
It is the argument in this paper that despite the far-reaching legislative and educational quotas for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, and their undoubted benefits, dalits still are savagely attacked in the rural countryside and in the urban milieu untouchability still knocks at the closed doors of such institutions as the arranged marriage, the caste Hindu temple, the classical music concert, and the private sector. The cultural hegemony of the dvija remains virtually intact. Dalitness continues to exist as much as an idea as a physical reality. The idea of the polluted bonded servant is so ingrained in the subcontinental mind that the dalit remains at the bottom of the intellectual and emotional landscape of contemporary India, however far he may advance in a public career and agitate for change. Every child born into an upper-caste Hindu family grows up with a mind`s eye image of the acchyut (Untouchable). The Imagined Untouchable is squalid in appearance and it is the religious duty of a ``pure`` Hindu to consider him perpetually inferior.
The Emergence of the Outcaste Pariah: The Dalit and the Brahmin
```If a kalash (vessel) of water comes into a bhangi`s (Untouchable`s) hand,` sing the women of the dalit Vankar caste, `he`ll drink and drink until his stomach bursts``` (Franco, Macwan, and Ramanathan, 2000: 193).
The poor Untouchable! So eager just for water, that when he gets it he drinks until his stomach bursts!
#18 Posted by nb on July 19, 2004 7:00:52 am
Rohit, my nephew is one of Calcutta`s top student debaters, he`s a law student too. Did any other kids go there or just you lot?
How did the actual debates go?
How did the actual debates go?
#19 Posted by rsridhar on July 19, 2004 7:02:31 am
re:#17 by Dalit
I do not deny the Dalits had to undergo a lot of hardship and i have advocated political empowerment through the ballot as one of the ways Dalits and other victimised groups can come out of this problem.
But, it is not that simple either. In UP, the CM is a Dalit. Has the plight of the Dalits gotten better there? I hear that Mayawati, the Dalit CM, has amassed wealth. Dalits still vote for her because she is a Dalit. They are her vote bank. Their plight has not gotten better.
Dalit`s fight is against a certain mindset that seeks to divide people on the basis of caste but in reality seeks to maintain their previleges intact in doing so.
Dalits in TN are doing various jobs. I am sure in many places like Bihar, UP, they are forced to do menial jobs. As long as people`s mindset does not change, it will be difficult to bring about a change in the society.
The problem of Dalit in TN is not with Upper Caste but other lower castes like Thevar whose clout has declined to the advantage of the Dalits, creating friction.
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/india/India994-07.htm
``According to the Indian government’s 1996-1997 annual report for the Ministry of Human Affairs, caste-related incidents in 1996 in the southern state of Tamil Nadu increased by 34 percent over previous years. Out of 282 reportedincidents, 238 took place between scheduled castes and other backward communities. The main caste groups involved were the Thevars, Naidars, and Vanniyas (all backward castes) and the Adi Dravidas and Pallars (both scheduled castes or Dalits).228 The number of incidents between Pallars and Thevars increased again dramatically at the height of caste clashes in the southern districts of Tamil Nadu from April 1997 to December 1998. The nexus between Thevars, the police, and district officials in the affected areas was repeatedly reflected in violent search and raid operations in Dalit villages, in the forced displacement of thousands of Dalit villagers, often with the aid of district officials, and in the disproportionate number of Dalits arrested under preventive detention statutes during the clashes. Abuses against Dalits continued following a police raid on the Dalits of Gundupatti village in February 1998 and violent clashes between Dalits and Thevars from October to December 1998. According to the state government, at least 251 people died in caste violence between August 1995 and October 1998``
So, u may have to change your theory. It is not Upper caste versus lower caste. It is the preveliged versus ``not so previleged``. A friction is created when the ``previleged group`` sees it power erode through various means and lashes out. In TN, the brahmins are completely out of the picture.
I suspect, same is the case everywhere else.
Read the following archive to learn how the Dravidian movement, which rallied all the lower castes against brahmins, gave the cry for empowerment of women and spoke against rituals completely failed to deliver the goods, so much so that the same DMK had aligned with the BJP during ABV`s rule.
http://www.media-watch.org/articles/0699/69.html
You say:
``In a hymn from the Purusasukta of the Rg Veda, the dvija are said to have been born from elevated parts of the body of the supreme being. The dalit is the ``unborn,`` with no physical link with the supreme being. According to this hymn,...``
``In the Manusmriti, (3) the dalit is described as ``polluted,`` in the same way as a menstru..``
I hope u realize both Rg veda, Manusmriti are ancient texts and are of no relevance today. Nobody in India remembers or reads these texts anymore. Few in India today can read or write sanskrit. So, quoting these texts is utter stupidity. In India of today, Constitution is supreme and is safeguarded by the Supreme Court. Constitution guarantees reservation on jobs and all other rights to Dalits that any other Indian enjoys. I hope u have not forgotten than Ambedkar, one of the makers of the Indian Constitution, was a Dalit.
Let me quote a passage from Mahabharata, where Yudhisthira the elder of the brothers, categorically states that it is not the birth but the character of an individual that determines one`s caste:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03179.htm
Excerpts:
(The serpent said, `O Yudhishthira, say--Who is a Brahmana and what should be known? By thy speech I infer thee to be highly intelligent.`
``Yudhishthira said, `O foremost of serpents, he, it is asserted by the wise, in whom are seen truth, charity, forgiveness, good conduct, benevolence, observance of the rites of his order and mercy is a Brahmana. And, O serpent, that which should be known is even the supreme Brahma, in which is neither happiness nor misery--and attaining which beings are not affected with misery; what is thy opinion?`
``The serpent said, `O Yudhishthira, truth, charity, forgiveness, benevolence, benignity, kindness and the Veda 1 which worketh the benefit of the four orders, which is the authority in matters of religion and which is true, are seen even in the Sudra. As regards the object to be known and which thou allegest is without both happiness and misery, I do not see any such that is devoid of these.`
``Yudhishthira said, Those characteristics that are present in a Sudra, do not exist in a Brahmana; nor do those that are in a Brahmana exist in a Sudra. And a Sudra is not a Sudra by birth alone--nor a Brahmana is Brahmana by birth alone. He, it is said by the wise, in whom are seen those virtues is a Brahmana. And people term him a Sudra in whom those qualities do not exist, even though he be a Brahmana by birth. And again, as for thy assertion that the object to be known (as asserted by me) doth not exist, because nothing exists that is devoid of both (happiness and misery), such indeed is the opinion, O serpent, that nothing exists that is without (them) both. But as in cold, heat doth not exist, nor in heat, cold, so there cannot exist an object in which both (happiness and misery) cannot exist?``)
Mahabharata was written much after Rg Veda or Manusmriti and is regarded as one of the Itihaasas. It is still very popular in India. The other 2 are relatively unknown.
The one thing that may change the plight of Dalits is : education. It is through obsession with education alone that Brahmins in India have dominated. As Dalits get empowered, they need to devote their new found previleges towards educating their children.
You seem to bemoan that Dalits are not to be found in new areas like IT while they have jobs reserved in govt sectors. Are u advocating job quotas in IT and BPOs? Surely u realize that these demand quality service and Dalits will have to compete with others on an equal footing. That is why, this is a non-starter.
It is through political empowerment and education alone that Dalits can better their lives. I see no other way. Dalits should not wait for the society to change. That may never happen.
Sridhar
I do not deny the Dalits had to undergo a lot of hardship and i have advocated political empowerment through the ballot as one of the ways Dalits and other victimised groups can come out of this problem.
But, it is not that simple either. In UP, the CM is a Dalit. Has the plight of the Dalits gotten better there? I hear that Mayawati, the Dalit CM, has amassed wealth. Dalits still vote for her because she is a Dalit. They are her vote bank. Their plight has not gotten better.
Dalit`s fight is against a certain mindset that seeks to divide people on the basis of caste but in reality seeks to maintain their previleges intact in doing so.
Dalits in TN are doing various jobs. I am sure in many places like Bihar, UP, they are forced to do menial jobs. As long as people`s mindset does not change, it will be difficult to bring about a change in the society.
The problem of Dalit in TN is not with Upper Caste but other lower castes like Thevar whose clout has declined to the advantage of the Dalits, creating friction.
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/india/India994-07.htm
``According to the Indian government’s 1996-1997 annual report for the Ministry of Human Affairs, caste-related incidents in 1996 in the southern state of Tamil Nadu increased by 34 percent over previous years. Out of 282 reportedincidents, 238 took place between scheduled castes and other backward communities. The main caste groups involved were the Thevars, Naidars, and Vanniyas (all backward castes) and the Adi Dravidas and Pallars (both scheduled castes or Dalits).228 The number of incidents between Pallars and Thevars increased again dramatically at the height of caste clashes in the southern districts of Tamil Nadu from April 1997 to December 1998. The nexus between Thevars, the police, and district officials in the affected areas was repeatedly reflected in violent search and raid operations in Dalit villages, in the forced displacement of thousands of Dalit villagers, often with the aid of district officials, and in the disproportionate number of Dalits arrested under preventive detention statutes during the clashes. Abuses against Dalits continued following a police raid on the Dalits of Gundupatti village in February 1998 and violent clashes between Dalits and Thevars from October to December 1998. According to the state government, at least 251 people died in caste violence between August 1995 and October 1998``
So, u may have to change your theory. It is not Upper caste versus lower caste. It is the preveliged versus ``not so previleged``. A friction is created when the ``previleged group`` sees it power erode through various means and lashes out. In TN, the brahmins are completely out of the picture.
I suspect, same is the case everywhere else.
Read the following archive to learn how the Dravidian movement, which rallied all the lower castes against brahmins, gave the cry for empowerment of women and spoke against rituals completely failed to deliver the goods, so much so that the same DMK had aligned with the BJP during ABV`s rule.
http://www.media-watch.org/articles/0699/69.html
You say:
``In a hymn from the Purusasukta of the Rg Veda, the dvija are said to have been born from elevated parts of the body of the supreme being. The dalit is the ``unborn,`` with no physical link with the supreme being. According to this hymn,...``
``In the Manusmriti, (3) the dalit is described as ``polluted,`` in the same way as a menstru..``
I hope u realize both Rg veda, Manusmriti are ancient texts and are of no relevance today. Nobody in India remembers or reads these texts anymore. Few in India today can read or write sanskrit. So, quoting these texts is utter stupidity. In India of today, Constitution is supreme and is safeguarded by the Supreme Court. Constitution guarantees reservation on jobs and all other rights to Dalits that any other Indian enjoys. I hope u have not forgotten than Ambedkar, one of the makers of the Indian Constitution, was a Dalit.
Let me quote a passage from Mahabharata, where Yudhisthira the elder of the brothers, categorically states that it is not the birth but the character of an individual that determines one`s caste:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03179.htm
Excerpts:
(The serpent said, `O Yudhishthira, say--Who is a Brahmana and what should be known? By thy speech I infer thee to be highly intelligent.`
``Yudhishthira said, `O foremost of serpents, he, it is asserted by the wise, in whom are seen truth, charity, forgiveness, good conduct, benevolence, observance of the rites of his order and mercy is a Brahmana. And, O serpent, that which should be known is even the supreme Brahma, in which is neither happiness nor misery--and attaining which beings are not affected with misery; what is thy opinion?`
``The serpent said, `O Yudhishthira, truth, charity, forgiveness, benevolence, benignity, kindness and the Veda 1 which worketh the benefit of the four orders, which is the authority in matters of religion and which is true, are seen even in the Sudra. As regards the object to be known and which thou allegest is without both happiness and misery, I do not see any such that is devoid of these.`
``Yudhishthira said, Those characteristics that are present in a Sudra, do not exist in a Brahmana; nor do those that are in a Brahmana exist in a Sudra. And a Sudra is not a Sudra by birth alone--nor a Brahmana is Brahmana by birth alone. He, it is said by the wise, in whom are seen those virtues is a Brahmana. And people term him a Sudra in whom those qualities do not exist, even though he be a Brahmana by birth. And again, as for thy assertion that the object to be known (as asserted by me) doth not exist, because nothing exists that is devoid of both (happiness and misery), such indeed is the opinion, O serpent, that nothing exists that is without (them) both. But as in cold, heat doth not exist, nor in heat, cold, so there cannot exist an object in which both (happiness and misery) cannot exist?``)
Mahabharata was written much after Rg Veda or Manusmriti and is regarded as one of the Itihaasas. It is still very popular in India. The other 2 are relatively unknown.
The one thing that may change the plight of Dalits is : education. It is through obsession with education alone that Brahmins in India have dominated. As Dalits get empowered, they need to devote their new found previleges towards educating their children.
You seem to bemoan that Dalits are not to be found in new areas like IT while they have jobs reserved in govt sectors. Are u advocating job quotas in IT and BPOs? Surely u realize that these demand quality service and Dalits will have to compete with others on an equal footing. That is why, this is a non-starter.
It is through political empowerment and education alone that Dalits can better their lives. I see no other way. Dalits should not wait for the society to change. That may never happen.
Sridhar
#20 Posted by Urstruly on July 19, 2004 7:49:41 am
Mr. Dalit
I hope you must have heard the adage ``Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me``. Please expalin to me when you fully understand that it is the Hindu religion itself that sanctions the system of aparthied with a divine mandate, then why don`t you get out of this oppression when you have the choice. Why don`t you become Muslims and become our brothers. Islam is the only religion on this planet that mandates equality not only among human beings but nations as well. Your bemoaning will not change the core philosophy of a religion, neither it will change its adherents. Who are you when divinity itself has mandated it? So you have a choice - please study the religion of Islam with an open mind and open heart - it has never hurt anybody. You will still have the choice to go back to your old religion that has hurt you so much, but at least make an informed decision. What you are suffereing and what your ancestors have suffered since millenia, in what book it is written that your children should suffer the same. In the name of fairness and kindness to your children give Islam a chance. Remeber God helps only those who help themselves.
#21 Posted by nb on July 19, 2004 8:20:34 am
what is wrong with you, urstruly, he is a muslim! this is barachota.
#22 Posted by pmishra2 on July 19, 2004 8:20:35 am
#17 Dalit
Dalits are only one group among many other groups struggling at the bottom of the indian economic pyramid. Overrepresented groups include muslims (strongly averse to modern education) and tribals (historically outside the modern economy). It would be good if your article were to acknowledge these realities.
As sridhar has pointed out, while brahmin baiting (based on 3000 year old texts) may bring some western NGO and christian money to dalit ``leaders`` as well as give pleasure at ``getting back`` at the oppressor, the reality is that 90% of violence against dalits today is from groups just above them in the economic hierarchy. It would be good if your article acknowledged these realities.
Finally, quoting western scholars like Dumont who have never travelled or lived in India probably sounds very impressive, but it misses the point. The point is economic empowerment of all indians, especially those in the bottom 25%. The point is to create 1000`s of small businesses run by dalits, to create an increasingly large middle-class based on education and professional aspiration.
Some of this has already taken place (thanks to the words largest affirmative action program run by the indian goverment
instituted in 1947
20 years before the great western nations recognized the need for such a program for their own minorities) and much more can take place in the India of today. But not if all energy is spent in attacking imaginary enemies and then begging for money and recognition from the UN, Christian Churches and impractical NGOs. All you will get is a handout-culture and a set of ``leaders`` whose main achievement are their large bank accounts and their ability to parade their victim status internationally.
Dalits are only one group among many other groups struggling at the bottom of the indian economic pyramid. Overrepresented groups include muslims (strongly averse to modern education) and tribals (historically outside the modern economy). It would be good if your article were to acknowledge these realities.
As sridhar has pointed out, while brahmin baiting (based on 3000 year old texts) may bring some western NGO and christian money to dalit ``leaders`` as well as give pleasure at ``getting back`` at the oppressor, the reality is that 90% of violence against dalits today is from groups just above them in the economic hierarchy. It would be good if your article acknowledged these realities.
Finally, quoting western scholars like Dumont who have never travelled or lived in India probably sounds very impressive, but it misses the point. The point is economic empowerment of all indians, especially those in the bottom 25%. The point is to create 1000`s of small businesses run by dalits, to create an increasingly large middle-class based on education and professional aspiration.
Some of this has already taken place (thanks to the words largest affirmative action program run by the indian goverment
instituted in 1947
20 years before the great western nations recognized the need for such a program for their own minorities) and much more can take place in the India of today. But not if all energy is spent in attacking imaginary enemies and then begging for money and recognition from the UN, Christian Churches and impractical NGOs. All you will get is a handout-culture and a set of ``leaders`` whose main achievement are their large bank accounts and their ability to parade their victim status internationally.
#23 Posted by Urstruly on July 19, 2004 8:23:02 am
nb
It is incumbent upon me to introduce him to the truth - it wont hurt you either. Be our brother.
#24 Posted by FouadShah on July 19, 2004 10:47:21 am
This story goes on to show that the minds of the people living in India and Pakistan are not biased or prejudiced . It is only the governments of the two countries and fundamentalist parties, who try their best to manipulate the minds of young people.
Welocome to Pakistan. Do Come again! :)
Welocome to Pakistan. Do Come again! :)
#25 Posted by Dalit on July 19, 2004 10:47:21 am
Urstruly
Are Muslims any better in India?
We, the other people By K.G. KANNABIRAN- Hindu June 8, 2001
The 160 million Dalits are demanding that untouchability and other forms of discrimination based on descent practiced in India be equated with racial discrimination.
The SAGA of ``the other people has not ended. It is shifted to the international arena. They do not appear to be part of ``we the people``. Serious efforts to bring these ``the other people``, who are rotting as non-persons in a caste-ridden society, to the status of persons were on for some time prior to Independence. The people emerged from subjects to citizens after August 15, 1947. After the coming into force of the Constitution all of us attained a political status with well-defined rights. The most articulate representative of the other people wrote into the Constitution human values and gave it a human face. There was recognition in the Constitution that for the other people to truly become ``we the people`` specific safeguards and positive measures were necessary. Caste was not abolished by the Constitution. Provisions were made to treat all castes on a par with each other. But the other people, even after 50 years, have remained ``the other people``.
Constitutions and Gods have always been good. The problem has always been with the interpreters, lay and judicial. The Constitution makes untouchability an offence. And it persists. Bonded labour and child labour come from the ranks of the Dalits. Both the practices have been made penal and abolished by the Constitution and yet they persist. The entire administrative, judicial and political systems are still exercised by the ``upper`` castes despite large-scale movements against these hegemonic practices. A few are allowed to climb the social order as political leaders or as judges in the subordinate judiciary or as High Court judges. In education and Government employment, the Constitution has introduced reservation as a principle of ensuring equality for the Dalits. The present ruling party at the Centre attacked reservation as the prime cause for diminishing merit and efficiency in administration, and by stoking the anti reservation stir brought down the Government headed by Mr. V.P. Singh which stood for reservation and secularism. Thus the bogie of reservation blown out of all proportion with the reality at the ground level has created a feeling of hatred for the Dalits among the middle class intelligentsia. The rights the Dalits secured after prolonged litigation appear to offer them a quasi-freedom and a teasing illusion that they are reaching the stage of genuine acceptability into the social order as equal members. It is more difficult to fight this teasing illusion than to fight downright subjugation and the status as non-person.
In the rural areas, violence against the Scheduled Castes continues unabated. Recognizing this, Parliament enacted the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, a law creating special offences which were made triable by special court. Look at the practices which continue to exist and which parliament has identified as offences under the Act. Very few of us would have gone through the definition of ``atrocity`` in the Act; nor would many of us have heard about or witnessed the indignities to which Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are subjected continuously. Where social reformers have failed a Constitution may not succeed unless the words in the Constitution are transformed into deeds. Section 3 enumerates 22 categories of atrocities which are made punishable. Unless we read the enumeration of the atrocities set out, we may not be in a position to understand why Ambedkar wanted to get out of the Hindu system, why the Scheduled Castes want the conduct of upper castes to be made an international issue.
The law was intended to afford speedy justice, the component of speed was to act as a deterrent. The lebensraum provided by the law to evade, defeated the law without any necessary for open defiance. The assault on Dalits is legitimized by the acquittal of assailants in courts. The offences under the Act were made triable by a Special Court whose presiding officer shall be a sessions Judge. This id entrusted to the Special Court for purposes for speedy trial, an aspect of Article 21 of the Constitution. This was interpreted by the apex court to mean that like all other criminal offenses it should pass through the committal proceedings before a magistrate. This enactment now remains only in the statute book and will slowly fall into desuetude. All this is achieved without help of a loaded jury system as in the U.S. Thus we have laws, constitutional provisions showcased to tell international bodies through the obliging Attorney-Generals that the caste of the Dalits cannot be equated with race.
#26 Posted by carpejuglum on July 19, 2004 10:47:21 am
While I agree that the dalit issue is one of extreme importance and has been ignored too often, I fail to see what relevance it has to the article above.
NB
We did fairly well. Of the three teams taking part, two of them made it to the quarter finals and one till the semi`s. The Best Speaker prize (based on cumulative marks in the 5 preliminary rounds) went to a student from our college. We were the only Indian University which managed to get visas....that too at the last moment.
NB
We did fairly well. Of the three teams taking part, two of them made it to the quarter finals and one till the semi`s. The Best Speaker prize (based on cumulative marks in the 5 preliminary rounds) went to a student from our college. We were the only Indian University which managed to get visas....that too at the last moment.
#27 Posted by kaurasach on July 19, 2004 10:47:21 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#28 Posted by kaurasach on July 19, 2004 10:47:22 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#29 Posted by Urstruly on July 19, 2004 11:15:53 am
Kaurasach
I think the easiest thing in the world is to through mud on others; doesn`t cost you a dime. If your heart is so soft for the plight of people, then show me by wiping off the tears from this Dalit`s eyes - hug him to your bossom and call him your brother? Can you do that? I don`t think so - a hindu has to be a god or mahatama to do that - you are neither.
Mr. D
My brother, I know you don`t like to be called by this word but you have to tell me how to address you. Until then I will call you my brother. So you ask whether Muslims are better in India? My bro all you have to do is to walk into a mosque and see it with your own eyes.
#30 Posted by kaurasach on July 19, 2004 1:15:33 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#31 Posted by S.Foad on July 19, 2004 1:15:33 pm
A wonderful read. glad to know that some people are willing to look beyond the norm.
I think that the Indian and Pakistani chowkies who like to quarrel all the time should learn a bit from the respected author.
I think that the Indian and Pakistani chowkies who like to quarrel all the time should learn a bit from the respected author.
#32 Posted by saint on July 19, 2004 1:15:33 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- usmi: It is quite interesting... Pleas For Sanity as
- Levitate: nkg... dead hindoos :)... Pleas For Sanity as
- Levitate: Zarrar Said are you... Nothing Queer About It
- nkg: HP.... If the world would... Pleas For Sanity as
- Levitate: :) dead hindoos ...... The Future of Indo
- Levitate: :) dead hindoos... Pleas For Sanity as
- borivili_express: jang its a very... Pleas For Sanity as
- dharma: Re: # 217 "dharma says... Pleas For Sanity as








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content