unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Advantage, Men

sameena khan June 16, 2005

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4

#52 Posted by preet on July 12, 2005 12:23:51 pm
nice article sameena, most of us have undergone such things and i m glad u had the nerve to put it in writing. and that too in such an interesting way. the shoe incident made me smile. i went thru similar experience when i went to buy a punjabi jutti.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#51 Posted by burpinder on June 23, 2005 12:06:20 am
Re: # 50

You are wrong. Believe me.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#50 Posted by BeeJay on June 21, 2005 7:02:00 am

#49 “Burpinder”
[What are you trying to say? I don`t have times for silly word games.]

You know EXACTLY what I am trying to say (and I am sure so does 99 percent of the chowk crowd, whose intelligence level is often held at such great discount by some people). As far as time for “silly word games”, I do believe you certainly “invest” enough time in “silly word games”, heck perhaps even in silly pictures the likes of which are seldom seen around here. (I could be wrong, of course, but I kind of doubt it! (I wonder when I last herd that before.))

Nothing personal, I dislike fake, that’s all!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#49 Posted by burpinder on June 20, 2005 10:58:49 pm
Re: # 46

What are you trying to say? I don`t have times for silly word games.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by zero_tolerance on June 20, 2005 3:16:08 pm
Re: # 47
What the F***!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by Adroit on June 20, 2005 1:37:09 pm
:) You are a sweet little one! Very rarely does on get to read innocence published in its true form.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by BeeJay on June 20, 2005 9:22:46 am
Dear “Burpinder”:

I must say that I am so thoroughly impressed with your detailed understanding of “issues” and your perseverance and persistence in continuing to “highlight” them (in your comparatively “short” stay at this web site) that I sometimes feel your “uncle” may be concerned that you are devoting more time to the internet and doing scant justice to all those poor defective motor cycles that you are supposed to be “fixing”. In fact, I could have sworn that there is a very familiar echo (which appears to go on and on) to your words.

I could be wrong, of course. I have been “wrong” many times before, again and again!

Sincerely,
BeeJay.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by kaurasach on June 20, 2005 8:22:27 am
Most tailors hold the tape in the center over the breasts - not right on the nipple. - the measurement should come out the same.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by temporal on June 20, 2005 8:14:20 am
saman:

don`t blame you for staying away from here! jeez...what is the term? ...retentive?

fail to understand why some want to tear to shreds a light hearted piece...my not for humour impaired comment has unwittingly assumed premonitory proportion!...maybe i should polish that crystal ball and change the profession;)...send in your queries folks..visa, mc, ax accepted;)

lve

t
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by MAV on June 20, 2005 12:08:58 am
Now why would you be needing a pack of condoms, dear girl!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by burpinder on June 19, 2005 11:07:29 pm
Re: # 30

Excellent post.

``Your light touch is being seen as open season for giving vent to repressed thoughts.``
*Exactly. When a woman says ``Boys will be boys``, you can almost bet that they will.

``Most of them found it hilarious, so what is this about “not for the humour-impaired”? I suppose for some people a woman saying such things gives them ideas about potential perverse “career opportunities”. Did you imagine such a fallout? My guess is No.``
* That`s my guess too. The writer seems immature and, frankly, not that funny either. I`ve read funnier on chowk and elsewhere.

What Sameena has to remember is that self-deprecating is funny, self-debasing is plain offensive.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by zero_tolerance on June 19, 2005 9:37:11 am
Advantage, Men?!?!?!?!

Well, the way Sameena Sahibah used the men working their jobs, it rather looks like women have alot of advantage. Same sort of behaviour if shown to the women salesmen, a rarity in our country, would be called sexual discrimination by women activist! The reason women dont progress in our country is due to the same women that ride the top of the food chain!

Poor show, Miss/Misses Sameena!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by BeeJay on June 19, 2005 8:12:38 am

#34 FV

(Aap shayad mujhe sharminda karne ki koshish kar rahin hain, lekin woh to (jaisa ki aap shayad janti hain) namumkin hai!)

I do understand (and I’m sure so does most of this crowd) that sexual exploitation of women is a serious problem and through articles like this, there is some danger of that getting trivialized. (I personally think that’s not going to happen with this article and with this crowd. Most people’s attitudes are already hardened (whichever way) and this one article won’t do anything to affect them.)

Also, the reality is that women in general are more empowered now. They certainly are (or should be) in a stronger position to deal with unwanted attention (or “perversion”, which could be considered a subjective word) with all their might (as one interactor claims to have done, by kicking that salesman in his chest).

If the victim were at an unquestioned disadvantage (for example, if it were a child (and I am convinced a lot more of that stuff happens to children than anybody dares to acknowledge)) nobody would laugh!

Anyway, when are you writing YOUR next funny piece (and I mean funny for funny’s sake, not as in irony/sarcasm or for promoting a larger cause/purpose)? By the way, I think guns should be considered outdated tools of violence used by morons who can not solve the problems of the world by using simple, honest words!

Also (and this in not said in humor), I am very deeply honored that you still remember my very first post on the Chowk site. Needless to say, I stand by every word of it. But probably that’s not new information for anybody. I could go into it at considerable length, were it necessary.

Notes:
[“…enjoy his 5 seconds …” a bit curious. How did you know his state? And were you keeping count? ]
And was she carrying a stop-watch?

[When I was in Karachi a certain male acquaintance wanted us … I think the ‘respectable’ gentleman was even more perverse.]
I think you have some weird acquaintances. But then, those acquaintances may turn around and say the same of you (for different reasons, of course (or at least, I assume)).

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#39 Posted by ZahraJ on June 18, 2005 12:19:15 pm
Re: # 27

[I never used to smoke in my office. I used to go in the adjacent computer room to to have a smoke. ]

Why should a woman inhale the cancerous elements ? How very impolite of you! Do you realize that as a grown-up you have certain responsibilities to your surroundings? At least appreciate someone who stood up for herself. Just like you don`t believe in smoking in your office, she must have an aversion to smoke as well. Whether she stated her matter in an emotional manner or a professional manner, in my opinion you need to learn how to manage people without displaying your feudal mannerisms.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by ZahraJ on June 18, 2005 12:05:01 pm
Re: # 30

I found your post more interesting than the article itself.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#37 Posted by nazarhayatkhan on June 18, 2005 7:53:34 am
Malik99 # 28

I told you a true story. I used the word `in general` and not all the women.

Off course, there are plenty of dumb men. May be more. But the women tend to expect a greater allowance for their inefficiency.

I have worked a lot among women employees in Air Line. Somehow, the Eastern women (not all) do not have a concept of ``just friendship`` . Our society also does not accept such a concept easily.

Getting a little intimate in the East, women (IN GENERAL) invariably expect this to lead towards a marriage. I have seen numerous examples where the initial green signal from the woman became an albatross in the neck of man - ruining the peace of the family as well. Sex is straightaway considered as a natural lead towards marriage.

This is not so in the West - at least not to that intensity. Obviously, women do not like to share men in almost all cultures - only the degree of reaction varies.

nhk
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4

Interact Index

    #52 preet
    #51 burpinder
    #50 BeeJay
    #49 burpinder
    #48 zero_tolerance
    #47 Adroit
    #46 BeeJay
    #45 kaurasach
    #44 temporal
    #43 MAV
    #42 burpinder
    #41 zero_tolerance
    #40 BeeJay
    #39 ZahraJ
    #38 ZahraJ
    #37 nazarhayatkhan
    #36 Hueees
    #35 FarzanaVersey
    #34 FarzanaVersey
    #33 BeeJay
    #32 BeeJay
    #31 drlokraj
    #30 FarzanaVersey
    #29 BeeJay
    #28 malik99
    #27 nazarhayatkhan
    #26 ntsyed
    #25 temporal
    #24 mubakr
    #23 stinger_kh
    #22 Romair
    #21 cipram
    #20 burpinder
    #19 bajwabilal
    #18 CheGuevara
    #17 dullabhatti
    #16 nazarhayatkhan
    #15 subroto
    #13 stinger_kh
    #12 slan
    #11 atif2
    #10 chesapeake
    #9 miriamk
    #8 freethinker
    #7 cayenne
    #6 Nadia_Zehra
    #5 BeeJay
    #4 HP
    #3 ShoreSahib
    #2 kaurasach
    #1 temporal

Latest Interacts

  • Goldfinger: Re: # 28 harish...unfortunately you're... The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Goldfinger: Re: # 27 SPY...known Indian... The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • pavocavalry: A final round has... NRO Is Just a
  • adnanmanzoor: Re: # 5 I think... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
  • MatloobZaman: Skeptical just read the... NRO Is Just a
  • MatloobZaman: The fact is that... NRO Is Just a
  • SPY: Re: # 68 Jayp: Dont... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • harish_hyd: #25 by Goldfinger GF yaar,... The Jehadi Frankenstein

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • Why MQM Wants To Enter Punjab?
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Ready to Rumble!
  • Kargil and the Myth of Losing the Media War
  • Fate
  • Eqbal Ahmed - As I Knew Him
  • Growing up an American Muslim

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited