Nandita K Baig August 3, 2005
#115 Posted by masanamuthu on August 4, 2005 7:01:48 pm
``- which by the way is written purely in Farsi and has nothing to do with any of the umpteen Paki languages.``
Yes, it is written in Farsi, which is why I still cannot understand it.......
..hmm.. I`m beginning to understand the pakistani psyche..
First a nation is formed on the basis of some ``arab imperialist cult``, and then the national flag is a symbol copied from a distant land, and then the national anthem is again in some foreign language..
Do you folks take atleast some pride in your ancient civilization (the Indus valley civilization), or you think that you are some nomads civilized by the marauding armies spreading their arab imperialist cult..
I can understand the slavish mentality after getting screwed by all kinds of invaders.. But this is too much..
Yes, it is written in Farsi, which is why I still cannot understand it.......
..hmm.. I`m beginning to understand the pakistani psyche..
First a nation is formed on the basis of some ``arab imperialist cult``, and then the national flag is a symbol copied from a distant land, and then the national anthem is again in some foreign language..
Do you folks take atleast some pride in your ancient civilization (the Indus valley civilization), or you think that you are some nomads civilized by the marauding armies spreading their arab imperialist cult..
I can understand the slavish mentality after getting screwed by all kinds of invaders.. But this is too much..
#114 Posted by Aslam777 on August 4, 2005 6:01:53 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#113 Posted by Romair on August 4, 2005 3:49:33 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#112 Posted by Soulat on August 4, 2005 3:46:21 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#111 Posted by Soulat on August 4, 2005 3:29:06 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#110 Posted by rsribhar on August 4, 2005 2:46:00 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#109 Posted by dullabhatti on August 4, 2005 2:29:15 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#108 Posted by Romair on August 4, 2005 1:57:41 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#107 Posted by delhiwala on August 4, 2005 1:11:04 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#106 Posted by cayenne on August 4, 2005 12:55:34 pm
What a waste of time!!.What a lot of hot air!!.Sound and fury signifying nothing.Everything`s normal, i assume.Carry on!!.
#105 Posted by rsribhar on August 4, 2005 12:43:08 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#104 Posted by rsribhar on August 4, 2005 12:37:57 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#103 Posted by rsribhar on August 4, 2005 12:36:51 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#102 Posted by rsribhar on August 4, 2005 12:34:31 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#101 Posted by kaurasach on August 4, 2005 12:26:27 pm
samina,
can you ever pen something on your own??????
i don`t give a damn about wikipedia........where any fool can inoput.
anyways u are dead wrong on sikhism.
sikhism was a reform movemnet that challenged the prevalent ethos of both Islam and Hinduism.....it rejected both dogmas.
Akbar respected all saints (superstiious???) ..... like Ranjit Singh, he was an illiterate person.
he jst showed respect towards the gurus of the time.....nothing more - WHAT support???
pls use your own brain - instead of copying from wikipedia.
can you ever pen something on your own??????
i don`t give a damn about wikipedia........where any fool can inoput.
anyways u are dead wrong on sikhism.
sikhism was a reform movemnet that challenged the prevalent ethos of both Islam and Hinduism.....it rejected both dogmas.
Akbar respected all saints (superstiious???) ..... like Ranjit Singh, he was an illiterate person.
he jst showed respect towards the gurus of the time.....nothing more - WHAT support???
pls use your own brain - instead of copying from wikipedia.
#100 Posted by delhiwala on August 4, 2005 12:23:31 pm
Saminasha,
Your source is so polarised and biased. Religous persecution reach it`s height under Shah Jahan and Aurengzeb to new limits. Aurengzeb was convinced by his Qazis that his mission in life is to convert all Indians into Islam. He did not eat his food till he had 60 KGs(approx 140 lbs) of Janeu(Hindu Sacred thread), in other words about 20,000-30,000 forced conversions in a day.
Is that your view point and you thinkt hat it is okay?
If Bush starts converting all of Muslims into Christianity by reasoning, financial incentives or co-orcion would you become a Christian?
You are only quoting one Mughal king(Akbar) who was realtively peaceful but what about 99% of the rest.
Your source is so polarised and biased. Religous persecution reach it`s height under Shah Jahan and Aurengzeb to new limits. Aurengzeb was convinced by his Qazis that his mission in life is to convert all Indians into Islam. He did not eat his food till he had 60 KGs(approx 140 lbs) of Janeu(Hindu Sacred thread), in other words about 20,000-30,000 forced conversions in a day.
Is that your view point and you thinkt hat it is okay?
If Bush starts converting all of Muslims into Christianity by reasoning, financial incentives or co-orcion would you become a Christian?
You are only quoting one Mughal king(Akbar) who was realtively peaceful but what about 99% of the rest.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nkg: Re: # 1 Kal... So, this... Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak:
- akcheema: Re: # 37; parthaab... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- tahmed32: Mr. Masadi: The evil... Three Cups of Tea
- parthaab: Re: # 31 nb, ... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- bulleya: zeejah #: "THIS one... Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak:
- tahmed32: pinku: So I assume... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- parthaab: Re: # 32 Madani, True,... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- nb: Too many points at... They Will Seal The








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content