unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Scream

Umair A Khan October 23, 2005

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#110 Posted by rsridhar on October 25, 2005 6:45:42 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#109 Posted by Netizen on October 25, 2005 6:06:02 am
Veeresh/rsridhar:

i think there is no point arguing about sending indian help to pak. There is just too much of mistrust. we should be take care of ourselves and help, if asked. there are a million affected in bengal right now. The more you guys will insist, more suspicious pakis will get.

Manto:

keep gandhi out of this.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by Behram1 on October 25, 2005 8:03:49 am


Re: # 109

Dear Netizen:

Thank you for your understanding [There is just too much of mistrust.]

One thing that you may not realize, but I found out recently that in England it is illegal to use the word ``paki``. It is legally considered a derogatory word for all south asians. Can I request that you refrain from using such terms?

Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,

BBA

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#118 Posted by Netizen on October 25, 2005 8:36:01 am
Re: # 114

Behram:

i use it just to be economical with words. I have too little time to write so wherever possible i try to be succint. Believe me, i don`t hold any malaise wrt it. I know that it is a derogatory term in u.k. but using it to poke fun at others is not my class. i don`t think any other indians would use that word to ridicule either, last i have not come across. so don`t worry i mean no harm.

as salim was saying the other day pakistanis are trying to claim it, because pak means pure in urdu.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#108 Posted by Beej on October 25, 2005 4:07:21 am

Sorry to get here “late”!

Here is what I read from the interacts –

(1) This thing started out with a commiseration session – all right and proper.
(2) Someone said – “why did you decline Indian help?” Somebody else said – we got enough SOLDIEIRS, give us stuff instead!
(3) All kinds of heated buck-waas followed.

Here is my conclusion – right from the beginning, instead of saying “Yes, but….”, everyone should have said just “Yes!” and stopped, because the rest was bound to follow.

Let’s do this!

The mistrust level here is too high!

It’s time for that mythical creature – chowk staff – to show some REAL guts!

Delete all comments (including this one) for being off-topic – except for the following (#1, #3, #“5”, #9, #11, #15, #19, #21, #42, #51, #53, #64, #68, #69, #71,and #74).

Be a MAN – chowk staff – no matter what your gender!

Let us not mess up what MUST remain a somber, sobering experience that mother nature apparently tries to knock into our heads.

Once in a while!

There must be a reason! Right?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#116 Posted by Behram1 on October 25, 2005 8:20:08 am

Re: # 108

Dear Beej:

You are an awesome writer. I like your writing skills. It seems that most of the time I agree with your thoughts, as I do this time. I do not think that chowk staff will do what you suggested. But instead, let us get an agreement from others, not to post anything that is off-topic.

And let us not make all posts a battle between Hindus and Muslims. Because, frankly it is not.

Respectfully submitted,

Behram B. Atashband


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#107 Posted by MantoLives on October 25, 2005 12:38:12 am

Veeresh...

My reference was not to the Indian Army- whatever it is supposedly doing. I think the world can see what it is or isn`t doing.

My reference was to the fact that you feel that I should report to you whatever I might or might not have done for the earthquake victims.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#106 Posted by harish_hyd on October 25, 2005 12:33:53 am
#96 by Romair on October 24, 2005 9:34pm PT

[They can be put into the education dept., and sent back to the villages as teachers........]

Well, that should be easy to accomplish given the fact that the Paki Army is not very famous for its fighting skills, as evidenced in the last 3 wars it fought. Had those 93,000 soldiers been teachers, they wouldn`t have had to face the ignominy of being taken as POWs in 1971.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#104 Posted by MantoLives on October 24, 2005 11:58:44 pm

``Please, instead, let us know what you and your close friends have actually done to prepare for looking after the refugees who will soon stream out of POK. ``


This must be a very Indian thing... to boast about what you`ve done. Whatever I have done is for my countrymen and not to score brownie points. As for the nature of debate... you are really funny for someone well advanced in his years... first you make a mockery of a great tragedy... then you politicise this discussion...

As for Gandhi discussion... I am afraid I merely used the term ``Gandhian`` as an insult.
If Rsridhar is calling everyone left right and centre ``mofuckers``... is he starting a discussion on incest? Please think before you speak.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#105 Posted by veeresh on October 25, 2005 12:19:05 am
Re: # 104, Yasser, this is not an ``Indian thing``. What India is doing is carried based on reportage from the Pakistani media. For example, please comment on this, as I am told that Daily Times is a fine newspaper?

````The Indian army is readying medical facilities, building bridges, clearing landmines and rushing supplies to its militarised frontier in expectation of a flood of stricken earthquake survivors from Pakistan, officials said on Monday.```` (Daily Times/25oct`05)

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2005%5C10%5C25%5Cstory_25-10-2005_pg7_46

And here`s more from the same report:-

````The brigadier said that his engineers had built a three-kilometre stretch of road to connect Chakan Dabagh to the Indian garrison supply town of Poonch in southern Kashmir. Elsewhere, Indian army engineers were installing a “flying fox” bridge across the Neelum river at Teetwal in northern Tangdhar district and soldiers were ferrying food by mule to Kaman Post in the devastated Uri district the two other points India has proposed as relief centers.

Engineers said they had been working non-stop since on Tuesday to clear landmines from the LoC to allow the safe crossing of earthquake survivors. Colonel Hemant Juneja, the Indian army’s chief spokesman in Kashmir, said New Delhi would be flexible on the relief efforts. “First of all, Teetwal and Kaman Post will also act as main relief supply stores with communications and all other logistics,” Juneja said. “It will now depend on Pakistan to accept whether our civilian doctors go across the LoC, or let people come to our relief camps, and allow the injured to come across for treatment and then go back. These are the possibilities,” the colonel said.````

+++

I am not making a mockery out of anything. I am only saying in a nutshell that while screaming is of some use to build perceptions, you must make the environment such that people can see and document why you are screaming. And simultaneously you must do something too, as well as not stop others from doing something.

+++

And to others from Pakistan, I reiterate, the Indian Armed Forces have a well-defined role in disaster relief within India and abroad which seems logical enough to us in India. Without scoring brownie points or anything, maybe some of that screaming could be used to try to convince your obdurate countrymen that this can really be so, that the Indian Army will not come into Pakistan and ``seize power`` like the Pakistani Army does every now and then.

The Indian Armed Forces return to their barracks after doing their job internationally, whatever it be, and East Pakistan/Bangladesh 1971 is a very valid example.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#102 Posted by MantoLives on October 24, 2005 11:22:53 pm

I appreciate the impartiality, justice and fair play that the chowk staff have demonstrated by banning Sadna, the other foul-mouthed Gandhian, earlier today.

Hopefuly rsridhar will be dealt with the same way soon.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#103 Posted by veeresh on October 24, 2005 11:52:13 pm
Re: # 102, Yasser, please don`t change the course of this debate, which is about the benefits of screaming versus actually doing something.

Please, instead, let us know what you and your close friends have actually done to prepare for looking after the refugees who will soon stream out of POK. We shall look after many of them in India, but I do feel that at least SOME of them should be provided habitats in Lahore, don`t you think, especially the bearded fundamental types? I mean, they will merge so well with the jihab boxes and the Raiwind gatherings and the Dunkin` Donuts?

I notice that my appeal from Pakistani chowkies for help in renting a ``farmhouse`` for Kashmiri refugees from POK in or around `Pindi has resulted in a deafening silence from most especially Romair, and a revival of the evergreen Jinnah versus Gandhi debate by Yasser.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#101 Posted by MantoLives on October 24, 2005 11:19:54 pm

Nope thats all Gandhian dear boy... all Gandhian.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#100 Posted by harish_hyd on October 24, 2005 10:56:25 pm
#99 by Mantolives

[These Gandhian tactics, this abuse, hypocrisy and double standards never worked... they will never work..]

OTOH, old boy Jinnah`s tactics like propaganda, blackmail, and rioting might just work fine. So keep trying Behram, you might get there one day!

Sorry folks, I have no intention of turning this into another Gandhi-Jinnah slanging match, but simply could not resist this.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#99 Posted by MantoLives on October 24, 2005 10:18:48 pm
Behram...

Keep your head high my friend...

These Gandhian tactics, this abuse, hypocrisy and double standards never worked... they will never work..

So let Rsridhar, Gandhiji`s biggest follower, roll around in his own defaecation.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#113 Posted by Behram1 on October 25, 2005 7:55:59 am
Re: # 99

Dear Yasser,

Thank you very much for the support.

Love,

Behram B. Atashband
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #180 mirmir
    #179 friend
    #178 mirmir
    #177 husnaangelique
    #176 mirmir
    #174 rashid_s
    #173 rashid_s
    #172 beem7
    #171 ZahraJ
    #169 Romair
    #170 Behram1
    #168 mohammedamjed
    #166 mohammedamjed
    #165 khamkhwa.
    #164 khamkhwa.
    #162 avkrishna
    #160 veeresh
    #175 shankar
    #167 khamkhwa.
    #159 Romair
    #161 veeresh
    #158 Romair
    #163 Behram1
    #157 ijaz_gul
    #155 Ahmadzai
    #153 Romair
    #152 aslam644
    #151 Romair
    #156 Behram1
    #149 discoverer
    #148 Romair
    #147 Romair
    #150 Behram1
    #145 soysauce
    #146 ZahraJ
    #144 ijaz_gul
    #140 ijaz_gul
    #154 khamkhwa.
    #143 shankar
    #139 jang
    #133 ijaz_gul
    #136 shankar
    #134 veeresh
    #131 beem7
    #129 Romair
    #142 delhiwala
    #132 Behram1
    #128 Beej
    #130 Behram1
    #126 ZahraJ
    #135 shankar
    #125 Romair
    #124 khamkhwa.
    #123 delhiwala
    #122 srao
    #120 Romair
    #127 Behram1
    #137 shankar
    #141 Netizen
    #138 Behram1
    #121 Kulharee
    #117 MantoLives
    #115 Behram1
    #111 rsridhar
    #110 rsridhar
    #109 Netizen
    #114 Behram1
    #118 Netizen
    #108 Beej
    #116 Behram1
    #107 MantoLives
    #106 harish_hyd
    #104 MantoLives
    #105 veeresh
    #102 MantoLives
    #103 veeresh
    #101 MantoLives
    #100 harish_hyd
    #99 MantoLives
    #113 Behram1
    #119 mohar11
    #98 MantoLives
    #96 Romair
    #112 Behram1
    #94 veeresh
    #92 veeresh
    #95 Behram1
    #97 veeresh
    #90 rsridhar
    #89 rsridhar
    #93 Behram1
    #86 rsridhar
    #82 rsridhar
    #81 rsridhar
    #85 Behram1
    #80 rsridhar
    #79 rsridhar
    #78 Behram1
    #84 veeresh
    #88 Behram1
    #73 ali_1
    #75 Netizen
    #72 mohammedamjed
    #71 ahi441313
    #70 ziahmed
    #69 avkrishna
    #68 jang
    #66 Kamath
    #65 pmishra2
    #67 Kulharee
    #64 SaimaShah
    #74 khamkhwa.
    #63 AlephNull
    #62 srao
    #60 Romair
    #77 Behram1
    #58 friend
    #55 adnan_rafiq
    #53 soysauce
    #52 Romair
    #76 veeresh
    #59 srao
    #57 Kulharee
    #51 ijaz_gul
    #50 friend
    #49 giani_240
    #48 Romair
    #46 kidbeegorilla
    #45 kidbeegorilla
    #44 kidbeegorilla
    #43 kidbeegorilla
    #42 temporal
    #41 kaurasach
    #40 MantoLives
    #39 ijaz_gul
    #47 veeresh
    #37 Godot
    #54 mohar11
    #56 Godot
    #61 mohar11
    #36 MantoLives
    #38 Kulharee
    #34 MantoLives
    #35 Kulharee
    #31 MantoLives
    #32 veeresh
    #30 jang
    #27 Romair
    #29 veeresh
    #33 Kulharee
    #26 mirmir
    #25 Urstruly
    #24 Urstruly
    #28 Kulharee
    #23 mirmir
    #22 veeresh
    #21 MantoLives
    #20 friend
    #19 rf786
    #18 harish_hyd
    #17 ballukhan
    #16 veeresh
    #15 Ameena
    #14 antihypochrist
    #13 Romair
    #83 Behram1
    #87 veeresh
    #91 Behram1
    #12 Romair
    #11 Ras
    #10 nazarhayatkhan
    #9 ijaz_gul
    #7 Romair
    #8 Kulharee
    #6 mirmir
    #5 BeeJay
    #4 Kulharee
    #2 Al_Bundy
    #1 temporal
    #3 mirmir

Latest Interacts

  • jayp: Re: # 31 nkg the homo... The Palestinian Puzzle
  • jayp: Slowly moves are being... Swat Calls For Civil
  • nkg: Re: # 26 GF... Oh you... The Palestinian Puzzle
  • jayp: Now the VP elect... Swat Calls For Civil
  • atif2: BJ Kumar reading someone... A Guantanamo Diary
  • harish_hyd: #230 by HP This is... Terrorism Unveiled
  • jayp: Another paki victim of... Terrorism Unveiled
  • jayp: Every pakistani, the first... Swat Calls For Civil

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Terrorism Unveiled
  • Year 2008 in Review-Pakistan
  • The Many Colors of Indian Corruption
  • Vijay Tendulkar: A Voice Against Misogyny
  • India-Pakistan: Hope for Prisoners Despite Ongoing Tensions
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Towards a Nuclear Weapons Free World
  • Squeaky-Clean Land
  • Cash for Vote
  • The Man Who Stooped to Conquer
  • Is Islam Undemocratic?

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited