Filtered Posts

Responsibility of the Media and the Repercussions of Terror Strikes #13 by aaendra

IT guys like Harish just know the old city by a map and nothing more.

Yaar how old are you? What do you know about me for you to make such confident assumptions? It just makes you look like a fool (going by your writeups, it really appears so).

Why should the round ups even happen if there is an overwhelming majority of Muslims in every government department?

Don't talk like a chut!ya. Where did I say ALL government departments? I said the police force. So look it up and then talk. And about the roundups all I can say is perhaps the cops know more, so why jump to moronish conclusions? Wait till the cops come out with some information.

When a Knock at the Door is Not Enough #123 by zeemax

You have a nice trick of making a statement and then immediately contradicting yourself after an immediate 'That said'. LoL!

Don't be a chutiya. Answer this for me: are men in Pakistan more benign with their wives than men in the west are with their girlfriends?

The Plan To Topple Pakistan Military #109 by Karachite

Pakistanis here bickering amongst themselves here

Karachi mian, if you read my post carefully, that is what I was saying. So which Madarssah did you study in?

Independence Thinker #347 by Yasser

And in the future no this: just because you call your mother a bitch and a whore in love and affection doesn't mean every woman in the world is going to accept this kind of abuse

Yasser mian, I may or may not call her that out of love and affection, but we all know you call you-know-who the same because they fully deserve it, given your frequent references to red light areas and the like.

BTW, whatever happened to the evidence of your claim that it was I who started it all? No luck? LOL!

Independence Thinker Tag team is in action, sneaking in like thieves when I'm away.....hahahaha, so what else is new?

Dear female Yasser, weren't you the one who posted my pic on your ilog and compared me to a phallus? This is the ilog I wrote in response to that:

"Dear madam, please don’t fantasize...I have absolutely NIL interest in you...besides, don’t you think it’s immoral, you being married and all?"

So why should you display such righteous indignation? Besides your knight in shining armor has miserably failed to prove that it was I who started it. Please comfort him all you can, he's rather traumatized.

Independence Thinker PS: And I don't need to prove to anyone about how I was provoked. I know it, you know it, and the female Yasser knows it. That's all that matters.

Independence Thinker #316 by Yasser

You are a joke. I've produced atleast 10 ilogs where you are showing us your family background and you've produced not even a single ilog/blog with any abuse from us.

Hahahaha!!!! Yasser mian, what part of "If you're bent on proving that I abused you and the missus, I already said that I have and it was in retaliation to abuse from you. If there is anything left to be proved, it is that I started it."

I already said I abused you and the female Yasser in retaliation, but you still don't seem to get it, do you? OK, I spell it out for your dumba$$ brain once again: PROVE THAT IT WAS I WHO STARTED IT. Got it? Good, now get to work.

And you do look to be rather insecure about your family background. Because someone with a normal upbringing wouldn't refer to others' families at the drop of a hat. Something troubling eh? Can I be of help?

Fight Hudood, Protect Women #32 by Mantolives

Sure..if every fool realized he/she was being foolish, there wouldn`t be any fools on this Earth, would they?

Absent in the Spring #30 by Urstruly

It is one thing to exterminate your helpless Muslim neighbor during partition and feel all high and mighty but you proved to be nothing more than chickens in front of organized Hindu nuts.

Aww..poor Urstruly, the eternal victim! Here`s something for you to read about how brutal Muslims were in attacking Sikhs and Hindus during the Parition.

Muslim League Attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab 1947

Terrorism is Nobody\'s Monopoly #31 by zeemax

Least of all, Muslims do not tolerate oppression and conquest.

Sure..is that why someone said Pakis will sell their mothers for a few dollars?

Love Ya, Dubya #200 by omar_r_quraishi

[i cant speak for dawn`s quality myself but feel free to ask around yourself moron --]

Then why give us the BS about increasing circulation (which in no way reflects on the quality of a newspaper) Mullah Omar? Besides, I don`t have to ask anyone, I know a good newspaper when I see one, and sadly for you Dawn isn`t one of them.

[-- obviously a gung ho bush-lover/paki-hater as yourself wouldn`t --]

If I`m such a Paki hater, why do I prefer the Daily Times over Dawn? See, objectivity in a newspaper usually reflects the objectivity in its staffers and Mullah Omar, you won`t know objectivity even if it slapped you hard on your face.

Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance #376 by antihypochrist

[...when are you carving a country for Sindhi Hindus.... a country for Jacobabadi Hindus, another for Hindus in Balochistan...]

You are a casteist, bigoted, racist Hindu or what? When Jinnah created Pakistan, he created the perfect country on Earth, an utopia. Anyone who accuses the denizens of Pakistan of discriminating against minorities is a hateful Hindu conspiring against the Pakistan ideology. If you want to know how well Pakis treat Hindus, please refer to Jinnah`s 1947 speech where he said ``Hindus will cease to be Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslim`` or ask Rana Bhagwan Das, Deepak Parwani, and Danish Kaneria. Please don`t ask Yousuf Youhana.

Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance #375 by Mantolives

And somehow the man who made the following statements wanted equality?

``If you are half as determined to make sacrifice which creates sanction behind us, if you are half as willing to serve first of all Musalmans and then the country as you would have me believe, the future of our community is assured``.

``We cannot accept a system of government in which the non-Muslims merely by numerical majority would rule and dominate us``.

Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance #370 by Mantolives

By the way, talking of pipedreams, how`s this one for a start?

``Gandhi was a Hindu fanatic. Gandhi was a racist bigot. Gandhi was a casteist Hindu.``

Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance #370 by Mantolives

[The word that comes to mind for your pipedreams is ``Khush Fahmi``.]

Now that you proved yourselves incapable of understanding simple English, you`ve descended into Urdu? My Urdu though is as good as your English.

[Gandhi`s truth is there in his works, life and actions. He was racist, casteist and a Hindu bigot. I concur with Mr M N Roy when he says that Gandhi was medieval Hindu fascist. There is no other way to put it.]

We all know that you will concur with any Tom, Dick, and Harry who writes against Gandhi. But for god`s sake, convince yourself quickly, posts from some very good interactors are drowned and lost forever due to the sheer volume of your posts. You could convince yourself even in your bathroom, why soil Chowk?

[Are you going to quote ``Paki from Canada`` for reaffirmation of Gandhi`s greatness, when his collected works reveal his reality?]

When you can quote Seervai, MN Roy and other assorted writers, what`s wrong with quoting a Paki from Canada? Just to rub it in, here`s another one from your rag:

Another approach

Sir: In the wake of Hamas’ victory in Palestine, many questions have surfaced on the international political scenario regarding its policies in the upcoming years. Peace activists around the world argue that armed struggle is highly unsuitable for the Palestinians. After the landslide victory in the parliamentary elections Hamas requires a change in rhetoric. It should take on an approach reminiscent of Gandhi or Martin Luther King, marching against Israel while remaining committed to peace.
KAZIM AIZAZ ALAM
Karachi

Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance #366 by bjkumar

[Yasser, that trick is stale and will not work on this interactor any more. Pure and simple. (And here is some food for thought (if you are the type that actually likes such food) - if you read my previous post one more time, the great golden ``secular`` Pakistan that you say Jinnah envisioned - where religion would not characterize an individual in his day-to-day life - was already in existence about a hundred years ago and it was already in existence in what is present-day Pakistan and it was already in existence in what is present-day India. And your great Jinnah personally broke that delicate harmony - the harmony that was REAL and was not a dream - with his own two hands - or perhaps with his own two fingers and a typewriter!)]

BJ Bhai, Yasser is not trying to trick you into believing that ``Gandhi was a Hindu fanatic. Gandhi was a racist bigot. Gandhi was a casteist Hindu``, he is just trying to convince himself. No matter how hard he`s tried, Gandhi still comes across as a fair and honest man not just amongst Indians, even Pakis. So even while Pakis revere Jinnah, they don`t revile Gandhi. Isn`t that proof of the man`s greatness? Now watch Yasser spin that it is because Pakis are a magnanimous lot compared to Indians that they respect Gandhi.