Filtered Posts

The Irreverent Hero Islam Forgot g'night...

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan later...

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan do you see how the chaprasses of tahmed and hamid jump to and red flag my posts whenever I make a post? This is amazing, how their tails are set on fire....

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan ana writes "bottom line: this is not about you. "

I have no clue why you needed to jump in to defend the chowk staff (dogs). My articles have been censored and not published for nearly one year now, I am sure that is not the "wait time" you are referring to. The ilog glitch if that is what it is could have been fixed, Feroz recently discovered it while I have been complaining about this "censorship" and extra prominence given for months on end to army apologists like leadenwinter on the front page of the ilogs. It might not be about me but it certainly is about my ideas. So, if you cannot fix this selective censorship policy of the Chowk staff (dogs)- which is probably staffed by dogs like Gill and the shrink, then at least don't try to defend it....finally get off my goddamned case...

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Chowk staff has deliberately altered their ilog system so that new ilogs do not show up on the front page, this way they can manage whose ilogs get exposure. They did this shortly after Musharraf's emergency in order to censor not only my articles but my ilogs as well. After they did that readership for my ilogs fell from a healthy 100 to around 25 or so.

I have put a new ilog, everytime I do that I will pick the most read article to inform people that an ilog has been placed

http://chowk.com/ilogs/66049/40823


Anil: you remain a dumb __

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Masadi: Learn how to read you fools. China's industrial base goes much further back in history than the 1980s, it was with the "Great Leap Forward" of the late 1950s and early 1960s, it had everything to do with "human cost and catastrophie", socialism and government control of agricuture and industrialization and nothing whatsoever to do with integrating in the global capitalistic economy or motorola.

Arjun:going by your ridiculous standards, everything can be credited to the first african who walked out of africa and evolved into the chinese...


Masadi: Your repsonse tells me that you are completely stumped! When I talk about industrial base, I mean just that, industrial base. No "out of Africa" explanation here, and motorola sure as hell had nothing to do with it...

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Anil writes "Massaddi Mian:
Where is the basis to claim a connection between entrepreneurship and non-primary products?"

If your "entrepreneurial skills" are concentrated in the primary product sector, products that many produce and products that are vulnerable to price fluctuations, you remain underdeveloped and your "growth", like Pakistan's growth is then either bribe or consumption or runaway population based. Maybe they don't teach you this stuff at Harvard Business School. When a primary product producing country gets an entrepreneur who has some idea to develop some indigeneous industry- you damn fool- unless protectionism is applied by the government he will never be able get it off the ground especially when cheap imports are available. More than "brains" the so called entrepreneurs of today need skills at manipulation, and they need skils that will convince the elite that what they have will make money- nothing too "evolutionary" about it, it is the same big dogs eating the small dogs BS. Now get off my goddamned case you retard.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan masadi: regarding China, China did not develop its base by integrating into the global capitalistic economy, it developed it after great human sacrifice

Bubba: Masadi you are wrong on this one...China was helped by the US corporation since the early 1980's. For example, Motorola sets up shop in China to get all those cheap chinese labor.

Arjun: yeah pal..they built it by reading mills..sure..

you may not be self-righteous hypocrite like prophet tahmed but gawd you're clueless..


Masadi: Learn how to read you fools. China's industrial base goes much further back in history than the 1980s, it was with the "Great Leap Forward" of the late 1950s and early 1960s, it had everything to do with "human cost and catastrophie", socialism and government control of agricuture and industrialization and nothing whatsoever to do with integrating in the global capitalistic economy or motorola.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan now g'night!... go to hell Hamid.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan majumdar writes "And their callous crippling of people's entrepreneurial energy which cud have shown a way out."

Enterpreneurial energy in the non primary product sector never fluorishes by integrating into the global capitalist system with established players unless protection- the very antithesis of capitalism- is applied, and then with that protection needs to be a sharing not monopoly profit reaping by the so-called entrepreneurs- the direction that you suggest pro entrepreneur with a trickle down, does not work to provide any way out it only creates wider disparities between the haves and the have nots....

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Majumdar writes "Masadi sahib,

(you cannot compare Korea and Thailand with India for obvious reasons)

Why not?"

At the end of the day, you really are a fake. You cannot compare Korea and Thailand with India because of i) the population and size ii) Thailand was never colonized in the manner that India was iii) Korea was colonized by Japan and Japan was unique in placing heavy industry in its colonies unlike the British that drained India and destroyed its indigeneous industry in its infancy. Even mainland China was spared the colonization of the type India faced that pushed it back a century.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Majumdar writes "Masadi sahib,

(you cannot compare Korea and Thailand with India for obvious reasons)

Why not?"

At the end of the day, you really are a fake. You cannot compare Korea and Thailand with India because of i) the population and size ii) Thailand was never colonized in the manner that India was iii) Korea was colonized by Japan and Japan was unique in placing heavy industry in its colonies unlike the British that drained India and destroyed its indigeneous industry in its infancy. Even mainland China was spared the colonization of the type India faced that pushed it back a century.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan later...

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan majumdar writes "If you can mail that link, please. Thanks in advance"

Like I said do an interact search and you'll find it. Your response was cheap and evasive, you deliberately ignored my points while copy pasting selectively. The partition catastrophie as well as what followed in 1971 as well as the condition of the Muslims in India as a result of the partition and the blowback is something that cannot be ignored when you pontificate on the "first rate" condition of the Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh, a divided base is always politically weaker than a unified one and with a different history the blowback would have been different as well.

Regarding leftist rule in India, Pakistan and its industrial development and India and its industrial development is in front of you to compare. Pakistan rushed to integrate into the world capitalist system, India resisted, it developed a base based on which it can now offer something to the West that is using it as a cheap whore to manipulate China. By the way in the 1980s only those less integrated countries were able to combat the devastating loss of growth and debt burdens- there are studies on this also that I provided a long time back- do the interact search from 2006.

Regarding Bohris, material resources was what I was talking about and the solidarity of a group that considers itself quite apart from mainstream mass of muslims, thereby the enhanced social solidarity- no genetic superiority has thus far been demonstrated in their brains- social circumstance is what has determined their success- even then their success is not interinstitutional and the group does not have much power inspite of greater wealth.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan tahmed writes "that is Masadi the Proven Liar and Resident Hypocrite.."

Prove it. You nor anyone else here can prove ONE lie that I have spoken here, not one contradiction either, you wont find anyone more consistent than I have been. you on the other hand have been exposed as a charlatan and a worshipper of the West who backstabs his own people as he finds excuses for rationalizing the butchering carried on by your masters the immoral m'fing barbarians that describe the ruling elite of the US.

New US Strategy Needed in Afghanistan and Pakistan tahmed, who the F are you to tell me to buzz off, does this site belong to your papa or mama? Lying fool, you read my post, you re-read it and cannot handle the truth and the fact that I expose every BS post of yours. Now go F yourself.