Its Not About Gender or Race Anymore

They said the same thing abt war on Vietnam. It's Vietnam war all the way for American media.

American media is biased. They never tell the truth.

Good article to read.

As for 'war in Iraq', it's a wrong phrase hammered into the minds of Americans. It's war 'on' Iraq or occupation of Iraq.

They said the same thing abt war on Vietnam war. It's Vietnam war all the way. American media is biased. They never tell the truth.

#4 Posted by masadi on February 18, 2008 1:17:49 am

Well said.

Drum-roll, the DEMON-crats:

Andrew Jackson 04 Mar 1829 04 Mar 1837
2 Martin Van Buren 04 Mar 1837 04 Mar 1841
3 James Knox Polk 04 Mar 1845 03 Mar 1849
4 Franklin Pierce 04 Mar 1853 04 Mar 1857
5 James Buchanan 04 Mar 1857 04 Mar 1861
6 Grover Cleveland 04 Mar 1885 04 Mar 1889
Grover Cleveland 04 Mar 1893 04 Mar 1897
7 Woodrow Wilson 04 Mar 1913 04 Mar 1921
8 Franklin Delano Roosevelt 04 Mar 1933 12 Apr 1945
9 Harry S. Truman 12 Apr 1945 20 Jan 1953
10 John Fitzgerald Kennedy 20 Jan 1961 22 Nov 1963
11 Lyndon Baines Johnson 22 Nov 1963 20 Jan 1969
12 James Earl 'Jimmy' Carter 20 Jan 1977 20 Jan 1981
13 William Jefferson 'Bill' Clinton 20 Jan 1993 20 Jan 2001

Good morning America...err...Mr. Siddiqui,

Sorry for not being a good boy; I have not read your movie reviews. You know how things were over here with our own movie shoot out in Liaqat Bagh! :(

Once you're done, please write a review of THIS book:
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm

It does NOT matter who wins. The policy must change for the entire world; many are America's jilted lovers.

Sleep well then. Those wearing the aid-diapers HERE are already wetting their beds spending sleepless nights.

Peace as always.

Re: # 1

Mr. Madani, here are the Republicans: (good for the world? You must be under a spell!):

1 Abraham Lincoln 04 Mar 1861 15 Apr 1865
2 Andrew Johnson 15 Apr 1865 04 Mar 1869
3 Ulysses Simpson Grant 04 Mar 1869 04 Mar 1877
4 Rutherford Birchard Hayes 04 Mar 1877 04 Mar 1881
5 James Abram Garfield 04 Mar 1881 19 Sep 1881
6 Chester Alan Arthur 20 Sep 1881 04 Mar 1885
7 Benjamin Harrison 04 Mar 1889 04 Mar 1893
8 William McKinley 04 Mar 1897 14 Sep 1901
9 Theodore Roosevelt 14 Sep 1901 04 Mar 1909
10 William Howard Taft 04 Mar 1909 04 Mar 1913
11 Warren Gamaliel Harding 04 Mar 1921 02 Aug 1923
12 Calvin Coolidge 03 Aug 1923 04 Mar 1929
13 Herbert Clark Hoover 04 Mar 1929 04 Mar 1933
14 Dwight David Eisenhower 20 Jan 1953 20 Jan 1961
15 Richard Milhous Nixon 20 Jan 1969 09 Aug 1974
16 Gerald Rudolph Ford 09 Aug 1974 20 Jan 1977
17 Ronald Wilson Reagan 20 Jan 1981 20 Jan 1989
18 George Herbert Walker Bush 20 Jan 1989 20 Jan 1993
19 George Walker Bush 20 Jan 2001

14-19 are the Muslim ummah's favourites, right Mr. Madani?
Now go read THIS:

http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm

Allah Hafiz

Setting aside the usual skepticism and cynicism in national races. I think Barack Husain Obama does bring a breath of fresh air into the process. He has clearly been a phenomenon not noticed by all the pundits and pollsters in the early primaries. Obama is very inspirational and offers new hope for America and the world. After being widely ridiculed, Obama has also backtracked on his earlier statements about the US troops crossing into Pakistan in hot pursuit. Hilary and McCain, on the other hand, have supported Bush in all of his misguided policies...Iraq, Patriot Act, shredding of the US bill of rights, the Middle East, Iran,..etc. I think it's time for the Americans to elect someone who can do damage control and reverse the slide in US perception among our friends and foes alike. It's time to emphasize soft power and diplomacy.
Riaz Haq, PakAlumni Worldwide

Ras:

I think both Obama and Clinton are unelectible. If Obama is the Dem's nominee we shall see some interesting campaign commercials in September and October from "independent and centrist" organizations, such as:

1) Hot Middle Name: Showing Saddam and Obama in the same picture and telling us hey we kicked Hissein's ass in Iraq, now why would we elect Barack Hussein Obama?

2) Bimbo Eruptions: A 14 year old white suburban girl relating how she thought Obama was alright, but how her Mom cried when she knew about the alleged affair. Hey y'all, would you want your child molested that way by a black man?

3) Tax and spend: Obama will raise the cap on FICA taxes, so watch out for yourn pocket book folks.

4) Obama's slumlord buddy: How did Obama extend his lot to build his mansion in the Chicago burbs?

5) Hard drug use: Hey Obama's book is interesting reading, Mr Obama confessed to using some hard drugs didn't he? Will he be sober or stoned when he's the commander in chief?

So my money's on McCain, the good old white protestant candidate that we can all trust.

Ejaz

Re: # 4
In a society where consent is manufactured and polls swing from one end of the spectrum to the other based on what the corporate media decides to give prominence to, you cannot judge the pulse of the nation based on who they vote for- there are saner more scientific ways of guaging what is going on.

how true.... very true indeed.

Would you say the same for the "islamic" countries?

Masadi sahib,

(they rescued capitalism when it was down on its knees by initiating a mild watered down version of socialism )

That at least shows that democratic capitalist societies have built in mechanisms which can correct things if they go bad. Little such devices are avilable to the kind of systems (Marxists???) that you obviously admire.

Regards

hamid writes "..that and the fact that they are easier on my pocketbook ..."

Yeah they feed the rich man with tax breaks and what not at the expense of the poor and social welfare programs- this again being their myopic short term vision, the democrats fully vested in the same system have more long term vision they rescued capitalism when it was down on its knees by initiating a mild watered down version of socialism that the republicans have been trying to do away with keeping the balance with rampant militarism and military spending....as usual the rationale of the "sage of the sewers", i.e. hamid stinks sky high....

Gender and race in america are certainly control criteria for the very vast majority of African Americans and women in the US, only those who are illiterate about social statistics regarding these groups will conclude in an infantile manner that just because Hillary and Obama are running, gender and race have become non-issues. In a society where consent is manufactured and polls swing from one end of the spectrum to the other based on what the corporate media decides to give prominence to, you cannot judge the pulse of the nation based on who they vote for- there are saner more scientific ways of guaging what is going on.

Madani sahib no republican has been good for Pakistan ever in the long run, and when the democrats show lack of interest in this country- meaning when they leave us the hell alone- that short term belt tightening is what Pakistan needs to wean itself off of US bs and doing their agenda...

Ahmedmadani sahib,

(Republican is better for pakistan. )

But bad fof Islam. Are you suggesting that Pakistan is against Islam.

Regards

Re: # 1

madani sahib,

.... that is why i always vote republican - that and the fact that they are easier on my pocketbook ....... the democrats are like pml-q ......

Thanks for explaining things in america.
Generally Republican is better for pakistan. Democrat presidents are not very good to pakistan.