Role of Pakistan Army Under Musharraf Just Stinks

in practice, too, i think. :)

in theory yes i suppose

you realise we can go on forever?

exactly, stop it already!

#360 by nb on July 17, 2004 6:44am PT
the proof is on this board, but i don`t want to rub your nose in it, at least you changed your mind.

exactly -- kindly take the trouble to read it and stop with this i-dont-want-to-rub-your-nose drivel

the proof is on this board, but i don`t want to rub your nose in it, at least you changed your mind.

#358 by nb on July 16, 2004 6:31pm PT -- 00181949
you did say that previously. if you have realised the error of your ways, good for you! why was the prez making up stuff though?he needs to be more well informed.

actually sorry to disappoint u but i didnt -- u prob wished or presumed i did which in any case isnt proof that i did -- the proof u will find in reading my posts which are available on this board for all and sundry -- as for him making up stuff, im not his spokesman, please contact the presidency in islamabad or his military secy :)

you did say that previously. if you have realised the error of your ways, good for you! why was the prez making up stuff though?he needs to be more well informed.

nb: Omar, you did say you wouldn`t accept the interview as fact. -- uff this is getting to be such a bore nb jee -- i cant keep on clarifying myself to people who refuse to understand what im saying -- i didnt say any such thing anywhere i u bother reading what i wrote earlier -- i never said the SBS made anything up but did say that their INTRO was biased and that the LeT was indeed banned since jan 2002 --

``And accusing the SBS of making up interviews is what was slanderous and can lead to libel cases. `` -- sheesh -- i dont think i need to explain myself on this score since i never said any such thing -- ``

---

well im sure most of their feedback is from the general australian public --go figure nb jee --


``Of course, you`re trying now to make it all look like a joke, but what does become obvious is your own evasiveness and doubletalk. `` -- actually the joke is how u make up things and imply what i said which i never did -- if u have the time, which i certainly dont, go back and read my posts and see for yourself if i said anywhere that SBS ``MADE UP`` the interview -- no wonder u brought the libel thing up -- based on something that was never said but which u wanted me to say so u presumed that i must have -- how typical nb jee --

and by the way in my last post 353 , i already said that i didnt say anywhere that the SBS `invented` the interview -- u gotta read my posts completely nb jee before u decide to respond

Omar, you did say you wouldn`t accept the interview as fact. I talked of accusing the SBS of making things up, which you did do,not talking about me at all, that was never mentioned so I don`t know where that`s coming from. And accusing the SBS of making up interviews is what was slanderous and can lead to libel cases. What does bias matter when your own President says LET are freedom fighters,not terrorists? SBS, is in fact, thought to be too pro-Palestinian and too pro-Islamic terrorism by many people, judging from the feedback it gets and letters to the editor. Of course, you`re trying now to make it all look like a joke, but what does become obvious is your own evasiveness and doubletalk.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

#348 by mog on July 13, 2004 8:17am PT
A many lot of morons are helping Omar Quraishi use up office time properly.

Yes, I think Dawn should provide for readers an unmoderated interactive forum. It is today needed!

Vote for Omar to be in charge, but how he will moderate unmoderated? So he needs ahmedmadani with him?

Omar, truth be told, many times I want to tell you, dont use word ``moron``, please?

truth be told mog/veeresh, many times i want to tell you, please post under your real name and come up with better diversionary tactics -- as for the forum please write to my editor shri veeresh sahib -- altho i think any unmoderated forum will probably turn out to be as bad as this --



#353 by nb on July 13, 2004 7:42pm PT
Omar, you can call the ABC biased. -- sheesh -- the ABC was used as an EXAMPLE -- i called the SBS was biased -- man u r good at putting words into people`s mouths too -- i never said anywhere that they invented the interview -- please go back and read the posts -- why would i say that -- what i did say, in response to shrimati jee`s tirade, was that the laskhar was officially banned as of jan 2002 and that the intro to the interview was biased -- now please report me to the australian authorities -- sheesh -- what a loser u turned out to be nb jee -- dah ling the paper said something about mr gutnick and that makes sense -- i suspect shrimati jee or u are not that important that dawn say something about them -- as for dawn saying something about SBS well dah ling we have laid probably more severe criticism at the doorsteps of the US govt, of our govt (dawn`s editorial of today called the prime minister of pakistan`s actions ``very strange``) and have criticised the biases and prejudices (to us) of various media organizations -- and we have yet to be sued on that -- well i was made assistant editor when i was 28 and now im 32 so maybe who know nb jee -- but we dont have a position of editor in chief for dawn :(


#352 by nikki7777 on July 13, 2004 7:42pm PT
#347....MULLAH OMAR....And, your cry-baby ,whiny-assed opinion of tomorrow will be???......

You really missed me , didn`t ya????

nikki boy -- i will spell it nice and easy -- N

---

O

---

that is ENNNN

---

OOOOO

hahahaha -- dude must u make an ass of yourself like this all the time

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

Omar, you can call the ABC biased. What you did was say the SBS had invented the Musharraf interview. I don`t need to send commandos anywhere-how typical to think of only the violent option. A court awarded Gutnick damages for something an American paper said about him because the paper was on the net and therefore accessible to Australia. But like I said, you`re not that important. Maybe when you make editor-in-chief?

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts