saeed qureshi July 5, 2008
#68 Posted by viewer on November 16, 2008 5:52:01 pm
Dr A Q Khan and Josef Fritzel
I would like to make a comparison between Dr Khan and Josef Fritzel of Austria, who locked, raped, and fathered seven children from his daughter over a period of 24 years.
Being a father of nuclear enrichment in Pakistan, Dr Khan’s relationship to the development of this sensitive technology in underdeveloped country Pakistan was that of a father to his daughter i.e. being a protector and a guardian.
Many of my friends who live in Islambad work for Dr Khan’s laboratories and tell me that while leaving the premises of these labs at 4 pm daily they are thoroughly checked at security points for possibly hiding some floppy drive, a little magnet etc, in some side pocket.
As it emerged a few years later, while minor employees of his labs were being kept engaged in thorough checking for little things like floppies, magnets, ball pens etc, his majesty the Head of labs himself was illegally selling sensitive nuclear technology to North Korea, Iran, and Libya and was transferring millions of dollars to his personal bank accounts.
Can someone explain to me why my respect for Dr Khan should be any greater than it is for Josef Fritzel of Austria? Both have done the same job of rape and plunder while being in the role of a father, guardian and a protector. It is interesting that the period of this plunder also matches for both of these characters i.e. 24 years.
If someone has any doubt about Dr Khan’s plunders, please come and visit his villa near Banni Gala, Islambad; please visit the Best Western Hotel in which he has shares, and please find with little effort the innumerable other assets he owns that are scattered around the city of Islamabad.
I would like to make a comparison between Dr Khan and Josef Fritzel of Austria, who locked, raped, and fathered seven children from his daughter over a period of 24 years.
Being a father of nuclear enrichment in Pakistan, Dr Khan’s relationship to the development of this sensitive technology in underdeveloped country Pakistan was that of a father to his daughter i.e. being a protector and a guardian.
Many of my friends who live in Islambad work for Dr Khan’s laboratories and tell me that while leaving the premises of these labs at 4 pm daily they are thoroughly checked at security points for possibly hiding some floppy drive, a little magnet etc, in some side pocket.
As it emerged a few years later, while minor employees of his labs were being kept engaged in thorough checking for little things like floppies, magnets, ball pens etc, his majesty the Head of labs himself was illegally selling sensitive nuclear technology to North Korea, Iran, and Libya and was transferring millions of dollars to his personal bank accounts.
Can someone explain to me why my respect for Dr Khan should be any greater than it is for Josef Fritzel of Austria? Both have done the same job of rape and plunder while being in the role of a father, guardian and a protector. It is interesting that the period of this plunder also matches for both of these characters i.e. 24 years.
If someone has any doubt about Dr Khan’s plunders, please come and visit his villa near Banni Gala, Islambad; please visit the Best Western Hotel in which he has shares, and please find with little effort the innumerable other assets he owns that are scattered around the city of Islamabad.
#67 Posted by viewer on November 13, 2008 5:01:01 pm
Dr Khan is struggling hard to wipe off the huge humiliation that Musharraf orchestrated for him back in 2004 and to which he became an easy victim.
However, I think it is too late now.
He has shamelessly displayed, in front of all the world media, his true character of being a thief and smuggler, to which we do not have even the tiniest doubt.
By this I am not defending Musharraf. The cheap tactics of mud slinging, to which Dr Khan now seem determined to resort to, are hardly going to clean his past or, for that matter, are going to do further damage to Musharraf beyond that done by the recent election.
However, I think it is too late now.
He has shamelessly displayed, in front of all the world media, his true character of being a thief and smuggler, to which we do not have even the tiniest doubt.
By this I am not defending Musharraf. The cheap tactics of mud slinging, to which Dr Khan now seem determined to resort to, are hardly going to clean his past or, for that matter, are going to do further damage to Musharraf beyond that done by the recent election.
#66 Posted by satya100 on July 13, 2008 6:54:55 am
Tahir uncle,
Do you have answers to the questions in #64?
Do you have answers to the questions in #64?
#65 Posted by tahir on July 13, 2008 6:00:01 am
Untruth-100, after returnung from the punishment of ChowQ's 'Kala Pani' has changed his name to Satya-100!
'Budha sathya gaya' (the old man is senile now).
Hell-come back!
'Budha sathya gaya' (the old man is senile now).
Hell-come back!
#64 Posted by satya100 on July 13, 2008 3:36:36 am
Mulla Mandar Multankar,
Why do you write these long sentences and very very long paras? Your evey third sentence is same as the first one.
Answer these questions?
1. Why is it hard to practice democracy where majority is Musim?
2. Is Islam demands spreading it?
3. In the case of Islam does the spreading happens mainly by physical force?
4. Does that mean Islam has to excessively depend on the armed forces?
============
Above questions were Islam applied laterally, ie, spreading across the land. Similar questions are there for Islam acting vertically.
1. Does the Islam demand the state, nation country to be Islamic wherever Muslims are in majority?
2. Does that mean politics in Islamic state means proving who is more Islamic?
3. Does that mean people have to be constantly be judged and classified according to their purity?
4. What happens to the people who are little less pure such as Ahmedi and Shias?
5. To keep the society pure does Islam demands the state to be a police state?
6. Since the police are not so well armed and well organized or disciplined, does policing work also done by army in Islamic society?
.
.
.
=========
You see Mullaji with red lipstick and pink maskara, Islamic society is not police state but army state. The people when subjugated to such atrocious ideology and its modus-operndi for long time then they internalize it. People start asking for army rule.
Why do you write these long sentences and very very long paras? Your evey third sentence is same as the first one.
Answer these questions?
1. Why is it hard to practice democracy where majority is Musim?
2. Is Islam demands spreading it?
3. In the case of Islam does the spreading happens mainly by physical force?
4. Does that mean Islam has to excessively depend on the armed forces?
============
Above questions were Islam applied laterally, ie, spreading across the land. Similar questions are there for Islam acting vertically.
1. Does the Islam demand the state, nation country to be Islamic wherever Muslims are in majority?
2. Does that mean politics in Islamic state means proving who is more Islamic?
3. Does that mean people have to be constantly be judged and classified according to their purity?
4. What happens to the people who are little less pure such as Ahmedi and Shias?
5. To keep the society pure does Islam demands the state to be a police state?
6. Since the police are not so well armed and well organized or disciplined, does policing work also done by army in Islamic society?
.
.
.
=========
You see Mullaji with red lipstick and pink maskara, Islamic society is not police state but army state. The people when subjugated to such atrocious ideology and its modus-operndi for long time then they internalize it. People start asking for army rule.
#63 Posted by satya100 on July 13, 2008 3:33:03 am
Re: # 61 Mad Sad I aka Mulla Mandar Multankar,
"... were left agog because there was not a single word that we could follow. All we heard were sounds like ‘Thoo Thoo, Khoo Khoo’ with the two ADCs wiping his sherwani because he was dribbling."
# 61 & 62 are al thoo thoo with lot of dribbling about Hindu bigots. I had asked you few questions on hw a majority muslim country turns into not merely a police state but army state. Do you want to answer those questions, red lipstick and pink maskara wali?
"... were left agog because there was not a single word that we could follow. All we heard were sounds like ‘Thoo Thoo, Khoo Khoo’ with the two ADCs wiping his sherwani because he was dribbling."
# 61 & 62 are al thoo thoo with lot of dribbling about Hindu bigots. I had asked you few questions on hw a majority muslim country turns into not merely a police state but army state. Do you want to answer those questions, red lipstick and pink maskara wali?
#62 Posted by masadi on July 13, 2008 2:54:16 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#61 Posted by masadi on July 13, 2008 2:52:58 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#60 Posted by satya100 on July 13, 2008 2:14:25 am
Mad Sad I aka Mulla Mandar Multankar,
You are sounding like Ghulam Muhammad. Like you he was also finance/economics wizard, but you have red hot lipstick and pink maskara. We also need to give a title King of Meaningless Posts.
"The nation itself was adept at conferring high-sounding titles on its leaders. Someone would be given the title of Defender of the Ummah, while another would be named Defender of Islam. It seemed to me that our people were temperamentally attracted to kingship and royal court culture. Madame Noor Jehan indeed was a great singer, but she was given the title Queen of Melody. Mehdi Hasan was given the title Emperor of Ghazal, while a lesser singer came to be known as Prince of Song. Even stunt actors were called Stunt Kings.
The same thing happened to Ghulam Mohammad when some industrialists named him Muhafiz-e-Millat (Protector of the Nation). Ironically, few people in the country knew that the man had suffered a stroke and when he spoke his words were unintelligible. The only person who could understand him was his Swedish nurse, Miss Borel. She would lift him from his bed, put him in his wheelchair and push him around the lawn to get some fresh air. Ghulam Mohammad often uttered abuse, which she had learnt to decipher in order to get at the intended message.
When Ghulam Mohammad was given the title of Muhafaz-e-Millat, the Karachi Corporation arranged a gala event with colourful tents adorning the left front of the building. I also happened to be there.
The governor-general arrived wearing a black sherwani and a Jinnah cap, accompanied by his army, navy and air force ADCs. The army ADC was the most visible of the three because he was standing next to the governor-general holding a handkerchief.
When he rose to speak, the naval ADC stepped forward to stand on the other side. When he started to speak, we who were holding our notebooks were left agog because there was not a single word that we could follow. All we heard were sounds like ‘Thoo Thoo, Khoo Khoo’ with the two ADCs wiping his sherwani because he was dribbling.
And this was the man who had been declared the Protector of the Nation. None of us took any notes, because we could not. Some who went up to the stage after it was over were told that the text of the speech would be delivered to their offices. The next day, the story appeared under big headlines in all newspapers. Pakistan had begun its journey towards the dark abyss into which it would eventually fall.
"
You are sounding like Ghulam Muhammad. Like you he was also finance/economics wizard, but you have red hot lipstick and pink maskara. We also need to give a title King of Meaningless Posts.
"The nation itself was adept at conferring high-sounding titles on its leaders. Someone would be given the title of Defender of the Ummah, while another would be named Defender of Islam. It seemed to me that our people were temperamentally attracted to kingship and royal court culture. Madame Noor Jehan indeed was a great singer, but she was given the title Queen of Melody. Mehdi Hasan was given the title Emperor of Ghazal, while a lesser singer came to be known as Prince of Song. Even stunt actors were called Stunt Kings.
The same thing happened to Ghulam Mohammad when some industrialists named him Muhafiz-e-Millat (Protector of the Nation). Ironically, few people in the country knew that the man had suffered a stroke and when he spoke his words were unintelligible. The only person who could understand him was his Swedish nurse, Miss Borel. She would lift him from his bed, put him in his wheelchair and push him around the lawn to get some fresh air. Ghulam Mohammad often uttered abuse, which she had learnt to decipher in order to get at the intended message.
When Ghulam Mohammad was given the title of Muhafaz-e-Millat, the Karachi Corporation arranged a gala event with colourful tents adorning the left front of the building. I also happened to be there.
The governor-general arrived wearing a black sherwani and a Jinnah cap, accompanied by his army, navy and air force ADCs. The army ADC was the most visible of the three because he was standing next to the governor-general holding a handkerchief.
When he rose to speak, the naval ADC stepped forward to stand on the other side. When he started to speak, we who were holding our notebooks were left agog because there was not a single word that we could follow. All we heard were sounds like ‘Thoo Thoo, Khoo Khoo’ with the two ADCs wiping his sherwani because he was dribbling.
And this was the man who had been declared the Protector of the Nation. None of us took any notes, because we could not. Some who went up to the stage after it was over were told that the text of the speech would be delivered to their offices. The next day, the story appeared under big headlines in all newspapers. Pakistan had begun its journey towards the dark abyss into which it would eventually fall.
"
#59 Posted by masadi on July 12, 2008 11:23:40 pm
The fool mkamd writes "Pakistan is not a signatory to NPT and is free to exchange any weapons technology with any country...."
Einstein treaties don't mean sh** in a US dominated world. You can be a major proliferator as the US but still get away with it while on the other hand not signing a treaty is no open license to proliferate. For colonized countries like Pakistan, phone calls from the foreign masters to their Army peons determine affairs, treaties mean sh**
Einstein treaties don't mean sh** in a US dominated world. You can be a major proliferator as the US but still get away with it while on the other hand not signing a treaty is no open license to proliferate. For colonized countries like Pakistan, phone calls from the foreign masters to their Army peons determine affairs, treaties mean sh**
#58 Posted by masadi on July 12, 2008 11:16:22 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#56 Posted by masadi on July 12, 2008 11:09:54 pm
Army apologist, Musharraf worshipper Mkamd writes "People like Masadi and Arjun are like propaganda master and hate mangor. They really do not deserve to be at any civil forum."
I am a "hate monger" because I wrote against the barbarism of the Pakistan Army as they out of deliberate fashion, in order to enrich the very few generals destroy this nation. If that is "hate" I am damn proud to be a "hater".
Now, _____ (expletive) like this person who try to sanitize Army BS throwing out numbers while not understanding anytihng about the workings of an economy, not to mention a society's structure that reproduces our colonized structure and the resulting impoverishment of the people decade after decade, are no better than the Army thugs they support.
I am a "hate monger" because I wrote against the barbarism of the Pakistan Army as they out of deliberate fashion, in order to enrich the very few generals destroy this nation. If that is "hate" I am damn proud to be a "hater".
Now, _____ (expletive) like this person who try to sanitize Army BS throwing out numbers while not understanding anytihng about the workings of an economy, not to mention a society's structure that reproduces our colonized structure and the resulting impoverishment of the people decade after decade, are no better than the Army thugs they support.
#55 Posted by mkamd on July 11, 2008 7:51:27 am
Re: # 52
"his is to bring regretfully to your notice that Masadi sahib has been banned again by the chowkstaff. And in his opinion he has been banned baselessly for benign stuff."
People like Masadi and Arjun are like propaganda master and hate mangor. They really do not deserve to be at any civil forum.
"his is to bring regretfully to your notice that Masadi sahib has been banned again by the chowkstaff. And in his opinion he has been banned baselessly for benign stuff."
People like Masadi and Arjun are like propaganda master and hate mangor. They really do not deserve to be at any civil forum.
#54 Posted by mkamd on July 11, 2008 7:48:59 am
Re: # 37
To Arjun who is a Loser with Paranoid Schizophrenia.
He knows too much. No country in the world let their top Nuclear scientist move independently or one day they disappear. Not even in USA! By the way, beside media specualtion, A.Q. Khan has actually said nothing new. I have reviewed all his interviews. He said pretty much what President has already conceded in his Book.
To Arjun who is a Loser with Paranoid Schizophrenia.
He knows too much. No country in the world let their top Nuclear scientist move independently or one day they disappear. Not even in USA! By the way, beside media specualtion, A.Q. Khan has actually said nothing new. I have reviewed all his interviews. He said pretty much what President has already conceded in his Book.
#53 Posted by satya100 on July 10, 2008 11:17:17 pm
Ijaz,
"Now on the ins and outs. During the Hind Chini Bhai China was In for Nehru and he placated Tibet for Kashmir. Then came the Soviets who rubbed you for a very long time."
Hindi Chini were Bhai Bhai, not master and slave. Newly independent countries who had thrown away colonists were binding togther to form third force. But China was imperialist communist. That was a blunder. Dreamy Nehru was foolish.
Indo-Soviet was not master-slave relationship. Soviets had science and technology to offer (IIT Mumbai, Bokoroes, Bhillais and even Nuclear power stations) and most importantly cheap armament (Migs, Tanks and ships/submarines) at barter or Ruppes terms. Soviets were not imperialists and colonists.
Ijaz, thanks for your ilog on your dad. That kind of tells us what tune you would be whisling. Before throwing stones at others check if your house is made of straw. This might be little hurtful, but it is good to see in the mirror once in a while.
"Now on the ins and outs. During the Hind Chini Bhai China was In for Nehru and he placated Tibet for Kashmir. Then came the Soviets who rubbed you for a very long time."
Hindi Chini were Bhai Bhai, not master and slave. Newly independent countries who had thrown away colonists were binding togther to form third force. But China was imperialist communist. That was a blunder. Dreamy Nehru was foolish.
Indo-Soviet was not master-slave relationship. Soviets had science and technology to offer (IIT Mumbai, Bokoroes, Bhillais and even Nuclear power stations) and most importantly cheap armament (Migs, Tanks and ships/submarines) at barter or Ruppes terms. Soviets were not imperialists and colonists.
Ijaz, thanks for your ilog on your dad. That kind of tells us what tune you would be whisling. Before throwing stones at others check if your house is made of straw. This might be little hurtful, but it is good to see in the mirror once in a while.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- Zeena: Re: # 193 tahmed... Terrorism Unveiled
- masadi: tahmed writes "get a... Terrorism Unveiled
- ModiForPM: What is happening in... Terrorism Unveiled
- sattar2: tahmed, You are mischaracterizing the... Terrorism Unveiled
- Pardesi: Tahmed, I just wanted to... Terrorism Unveiled
- Pardesi: #192 tahmed ... you... Terrorism Unveiled
- anil: Re: # 181 Romair: "....now you... Terrorism Unveiled
- tahmed32: masadi the foul mouthed,... Terrorism Unveiled








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content