Aasim Khan June 26, 2004
#5 Posted by AmericanFOB on June 28, 2004 1:27:43 pm
Very catchy piece. Couldn`t move my eyes off of the page. Didn`t like the way you ended it though.
#4 Posted by nikki7777 on June 27, 2004 11:19:25 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#3 Posted by hamidm2 on June 27, 2004 7:54:40 am
....... loved it !.........was it worth it?........... i wonder what kind of anal people sit around making these silly laws ............ at least you can get a bottle of booze past the goons at isb as long as you give them one ............
#2 Posted by Saminasha on June 26, 2004 3:52:41 pm
Plus the moral ambiguity of the piece is the kind of brave leap you dont see enough on Chowk these days. Credit to the writer for having narrator sympathetic, intelligent, Pakistani and law breaking at the same time!
#1 Posted by Saminasha on June 26, 2004 12:13:42 pm
This is pretty good. Clean, spare language, good time shifting. Stay away from the triple exclaimation marks.
More, please.
More, please.
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Kiss of Death Tazeen Javed
- Cynicism Amongst Pakistani Youth Ikramul Haq
- Confessions of Webaholics Zainub Razvi
- Alcohol Use and Abuse Khalid Sohail
- The first time I quit Zehra Rizvi
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- masadi: tahmed writes "and i... Why Zardari Should Be
- rabiawsti: #42 well, land reforms predated... There is no ‘honour’
- hamidm2: Re: # 74 masadi mian, "Ahmad... Why Zardari Should Be
- masadi: hamid writes to tahmed"...... Why Zardari Should Be
- masadi: Venga writes "HP, this... There is no ‘honour’
- masadi: Here is an article... There is no ‘honour’
- masadi: HP writes "were large... There is no ‘honour’
- tahmed32: #72 hamidm: i grew... Why Zardari Should Be








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content