Murder of a Killer

Yes a good read.

One factual error: Naseer Khan is perhaps alive and is the only eye-witness of the incident.

We need to discuss ``extra judicial killings`` from moral, legal and sociological perspective in view of the practically non-functional judicial system.

please ignore the ignorants (#6 e.g.)

This is a good read: you live by the gun, you die by the gun.

But these guys are cuddly teddy bears when compared with the real mccoys, google and read about inspectors zeeshan kazmi, aslam hayat, taufiq zahid, anwar rao and bahadur ali.

the story was chilling...its unusual for chowk to publish such a write up but whats wrong in publishing it...true naveed deserved such an end.....but i wud have appreciated had he been prosecuted in court rather then die on street.....and he should have reached the end earlier.....before he could harm so many people

Yes kya ho raha hai chowk par!! Will chowk editors (or self-appointed chowk police - currently active on ``Echos`` board) please explain how his writeup made it through editing process?

Re: # 2

tells you about the state of mind of editors.

this story precisely is what i call: ``when shit meets dust.``

naveed couldnt have a better ending. good for him and many others who whill meet the same ending.

fascinating. these people would not be out of place in a tarantino movie. maybe you should pitch this kahani to him.

... and what is the point of this meaningless FIR on chowk...

good journalism......kamran bhai how do u get this underworld info......? just curious......i read many articles like these.....related to trafficking mafia and drug dealers......i always wonder how journalists reach there.......c u
ammara