Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
"part of me really feels sorry for you because you have to defend a criminal who caused a holocaust on the subcontinent."
I protest. I have NEVER defended Gandhi the abovementioned criminal.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:58 am
Re: # 62"part of me really feels sorry for you because you have to defend a criminal who caused a holocaust on the subcontinent."
I protest. I have NEVER defended Gandhi the abovementioned criminal.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Mobilink i.e. Pakistan Mobile Communications Limited is a Pakistani company incorporated in 1992 by the Saif group... it was completely taken over by Orascom only recently ...
And I did call Rutgers "Public Ivy" ... which it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Ivy
Now where does that leave you ? Oh yes you are a liar.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:57 am
Re: # 59Mobilink i.e. Pakistan Mobile Communications Limited is a Pakistani company incorporated in 1992 by the Saif group... it was completely taken over by Orascom only recently ...
And I did call Rutgers "Public Ivy" ... which it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Ivy
Now where does that leave you ? Oh yes you are a liar.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Jinnah's ideals were shared by B R Ambedkar. B R Ambedkar drafted India's constitution. So your statement does make sense.
Meanwhile we have Gandhians running amok ... do you know that in 1953 the Majlis-e-Amal... consisting of Ahrar... called its Anti-Ahmaddiya movement "Satyagraha"?
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:51 am
Re: # 55Jinnah's ideals were shared by B R Ambedkar. B R Ambedkar drafted India's constitution. So your statement does make sense.
Meanwhile we have Gandhians running amok ... do you know that in 1953 the Majlis-e-Amal... consisting of Ahrar... called its Anti-Ahmaddiya movement "Satyagraha"?
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
I have whooped your ass so many times on this discussion that it is not worth it anymore. Marginal utility of whooping your ass has been on a nose dive.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:48 am
Harish mian,I have whooped your ass so many times on this discussion that it is not worth it anymore. Marginal utility of whooping your ass has been on a nose dive.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
I have no idea what your status as a Non-Ahmedi Muslim accepting Ahmadis rights to call themselves anything has to do with this discussion. This is not the only board this issue has been discussed... and if you were to visit some of the other boards like Pakistaniat etc... you would find most Pakistani Non-Ahmadi Muslims in favor of Ahmadis' rights ... it is just that chowk is humble abode of freaks.
As for religion blah blah... we have discussed this issue to death but Pakistan was not a country founded in the name of religion... it was founded in the name of group rights. Had Jinnah been any less of a statesman he would have - like many "great" Indian Muslim leaders ... preferred to be on the "right side" of Mahatma instead of doing something for his people.
And 50 or 60 years are nothing in the life of a nation. Perhaps in 1850s you would be questioning the founding of the US because the SC refused to accept black people as citizens (under dredd scott decision).
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:46 am
Re: # 48I have no idea what your status as a Non-Ahmedi Muslim accepting Ahmadis rights to call themselves anything has to do with this discussion. This is not the only board this issue has been discussed... and if you were to visit some of the other boards like Pakistaniat etc... you would find most Pakistani Non-Ahmadi Muslims in favor of Ahmadis' rights ... it is just that chowk is humble abode of freaks.
As for religion blah blah... we have discussed this issue to death but Pakistan was not a country founded in the name of religion... it was founded in the name of group rights. Had Jinnah been any less of a statesman he would have - like many "great" Indian Muslim leaders ... preferred to be on the "right side" of Mahatma instead of doing something for his people.
And 50 or 60 years are nothing in the life of a nation. Perhaps in 1850s you would be questioning the founding of the US because the SC refused to accept black people as citizens (under dredd scott decision).
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Stay on the topic... Gandhi's racism.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:40 am
Oh come on... so you can't defend racist Gandhi... you have to lie about and abuse Jinnah? We all know Congress carried out the slaughter of Muslims in Calcutta. How many times must you be shamed with evidence?Stay on the topic... Gandhi's racism.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
A 45 year old Indian Mahatma goes around calling Black people subhuman for many years... Then he doesn't have the grace to accept that he was wrong. I would imagine that it is not slender evidence.
AKCheema,
It is true that none of what Lincoln said even comes close to Gandhi's racism which in any event was much more rooted in "Indo-Aryan superiority" of the kind Adolf Hitler ascribed to.
But Lincoln never really claimed otherwise either. He was a white president of a white country whose issue was with slavery and not really race relations.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:35 am
Re: # 44A 45 year old Indian Mahatma goes around calling Black people subhuman for many years... Then he doesn't have the grace to accept that he was wrong. I would imagine that it is not slender evidence.
AKCheema,
It is true that none of what Lincoln said even comes close to Gandhi's racism which in any event was much more rooted in "Indo-Aryan superiority" of the kind Adolf Hitler ascribed to.
But Lincoln never really claimed otherwise either. He was a white president of a white country whose issue was with slavery and not really race relations.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
You can go on saying whatever you wish... however Gandhi and Adolf Hitler were contemporaries... we abuse Hitler for holding the same view but let the great Mahatma off the hook?
And yes ... Lincoln's racism is now an accepted fact... though it does not compare to what Gandhi said and did.
And if you think all this was "early on" in Gandhi's political career, surely you can find a single apology from the casteist freak in any time after this ...
As for this myth that poor idiots like BJ and others wish to create about Jinnah... Ian Bryant Wells recently published a book in India on Jinnah which very succinctly blew to pieces the "elitist myth".
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:24 am
AKcheema,You can go on saying whatever you wish... however Gandhi and Adolf Hitler were contemporaries... we abuse Hitler for holding the same view but let the great Mahatma off the hook?
And yes ... Lincoln's racism is now an accepted fact... though it does not compare to what Gandhi said and did.
And if you think all this was "early on" in Gandhi's political career, surely you can find a single apology from the casteist freak in any time after this ...
As for this myth that poor idiots like BJ and others wish to create about Jinnah... Ian Bryant Wells recently published a book in India on Jinnah which very succinctly blew to pieces the "elitist myth".
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Because my dear friend ...the great man who wrote your constitution B R Ambedkar hated Gandhi.. and deliberately kept Gandhuism out of the constitution. You may read ICA debates.
However you may also go to the Darul Itfa of Darul Uloom Deoband (Gandhi's favorite boys) and read their fatwas against Ahmadis.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:19 am
Because my dear friend ...the great man who wrote your constitution B R Ambedkar hated Gandhi.. and deliberately kept Gandhuism out of the constitution. You may read ICA debates.
However you may also go to the Darul Itfa of Darul Uloom Deoband (Gandhi's favorite boys) and read their fatwas against Ahmadis.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Working with the oppressor is to go from town to town recruiting Soldiers like Gandhi did ... for which he earned the title Qaiser-e-Hind.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:09 am
Re: # 36Working with the oppressor is to go from town to town recruiting Soldiers like Gandhi did ... for which he earned the title Qaiser-e-Hind.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
How about calling black people subhuman for being black like Adolf Hitler's Indian Twin Gandhi BC did?
On What Gandhi wanted
The last week has been very busy. We have not had a moment's leisure.
We saw Mr. Theodore Morison of Aligarh and the well-known Mr. Stead of
the Review of Reviews. Mr. Stead has boldly come out to give us all
the help he can. He was therefore requested to write to the same Boer
leaders that they should not consider Indians as being on the same
level as Kaffirs
Indian Opinion, 15-12-1906, CWOMG Vol. 6, pg 183
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (3)
CLASSIFICATION OF ASIATICS WITH NATIVES
The cell was situated in the Native quarters and we were housed in one
that was labeled 'For Coloured Debtors'. It was this experience for
which we were perhaps all unprepared. We had fondly imagined that we
would have suitable quarters apart from the Natives. As it was,
perhaps, just as well that we were classed with Natives. We would now
be able to study the life of Native prisoners, their customs and
manners. ...Degradation underlay the classing of Indians with natives.
The Asiatic Act seemed to me to be the summit of our degradation. It
did appear to me, as I think it would appear to any unprejudiced
reader, that it would have been simple humanity if we were given
special quarters. ...the Governor of the gaol tried to make us as
comfortable as he could...But he was powerless to accommodate us
beyond the horrible din and the yells of the Native prisoners
throughout the day and partly at night also. Many of the native
prisoners are only one degree removed from the animal and often
created rows and fought amongst themselves in their cells.
Indian Opinion 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 120
Apart from whether or not this implies degradation, I must say it is
rather dangerous. Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized -- the convicts
even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty, and live almost like
animals. Each ward contains nearly 50 to 60 of them. They often
started rows and fought among themselves. The reader can easily
imagine the plight of the poor Indian thrown into such company
Indian Opinion, 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 135
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (2)
INDIANS ON PAR WITH KAFFIRS
There, our garments were stamped with the letter 'N', which meant that
we were being classed with the Natives. We were all prepared for
hardships, but not quite for this experience. We could understand not
being classed with the whites, but to be placed on the same level with
the Natives seemed too much to put up with. I then felt that Indians
had launched on passive resistance too soon. Here was further proof
that the obnoxious law was intended to emasculate the Indians.
It was, however, as well that we were classified with the Natives. It
was a welcome opportunity to study the treatment meted out to the
Natives, their conditions [of life in the gaol] and their habits.
...We were given a separate ward because we were sentenced to simple
imprisonment; otherwise we would have been in the same ward [with the
Kaffirs]. Indians sentenced to hard labour are in fact kept with the
Kaffirs.
Apart from whether or not this implies degradation, I must say it is
rather dangerous. Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized -- the convicts
even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty, and live almost like
animals. Each ward contains nearly 50 to 60 of them. They often
started rows and fought among themselves. The reader can easily
imagine the plight of the poor Indian thrown into such company
Indian Opinion, 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 135
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (1)
I have, though, resolved in my mind on an agitation to ensure that
Indian prisoners are not lodged with Kaffirs or others. When I arrived
at the place, there were about 15 Indian prisoners. Except for three,
all of them were satyagrahis. The three were charged with other
offences. These prisoners were generally lodged with kaffirs. When I
reached there, the chief warder issued an order that all of us should
be lodged in a separate room. I observed with regret that some Indians
were happy to sleep in the same room as the Kaffirs, the reason being
that they hoped there for a secret supply of tobacco, etc. This is a
matter of shame to us. We may entertain no aversion to the Kaffirs,
but we cannot ignore the fact that there is no common ground between
them and us in the daily affairs of life. Moreover, those who wish to
sleep in the same room have ulterior motives for doing so.
Obviously, we ought to abandon such notions if we want to make progress.
Indian Opinion, 6-1-1909, CWOMG Vol. 9, pg 149
On What Gandhi wanted (9)
Gandhi's disdain for black people continues:
It is one thing to register Natives who would not work, and whom it is
very difficult to find out if they absent themselves, but it is
another thing and most insulting to expect decent, hard-working, and
respectable Indians, whose only fault is that they work too much, to
have themselves registered
What is a Coolie, Indian Opinion 2151904, CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 193
CWOMG: Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (8)
The whole affair is as much a disgrace to the Indian community as it
is to the British Empire. The British rulers take us to be so lowly
and ignorant that they assume that, like the Kaffirs who can be
pleased with toys and pins, we can also be fobbed off with trinkets
Indian Opinion, 29-2-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 105
CWOMG: Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (7)
More on SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL theory of Gandhiji...
His Excellency has, moreover, justified the definition of 'coloured
person' on the ground that it is a legacy from the old Government. But
British Indians object to the definition for that very reason. Their
position is this. The ordinances will not in practice apply to them.
The Boer Government insulted the Indians by classing them with the
Kaffirs. Now there is no occasion to perpetuate a needless insult
Indians in the O.R.C, Indian Opinion, 6-1-1906, CWOMG, Vol. 5, pg 177-178
Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi: CWOMG
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (6)
More on SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL theory of Gandhiji...
His Excellency has, moreover, justified the definition of 'coloured
person' on the ground that it is a legacy from the old Government. But
British Indians object to the definition for that very reason. Their
position is this. The ordinances will not in practice apply to them.
The Boer Government insulted the Indians by classing them with the
Kaffirs. Now there is no occasion to perpetuate a needless insult
Indians in the O.R.C, Indian Opinion, 6-1-1906, CWOMG, Vol. 5, pg 177-178
Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi: CWOMG
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (5)
It reduces British Indians to a status lower than that of the
aboriginal races of South Africa and the Coloured people.
Indian Opinion 15-9-1906, CWOMG Vol. 5, pg 419-423
On What Gandhi wanted (14)
On Minority White rule in South Africa:
We, therefore, have no hesitation in agreeing with the view that in
the long run assisted Asiatic immigration into the Transvaal would be
disastrous to the white settlement. People will gradually accommodate
themselves to relying upon Asiatic labour, and any White immigration
of the special class required in the Transvaal on a large scale will
be practically impossible. It would be equally unfair to the Natives
of the soil. It is all very well to say that they would not work, and
that, if the Asiatics were introduced, that would be a stimulus to
work; but human nature is the same everywhere, and once Asiatic labour
is resorted to, there would not be a sustained effort to induce the
Natives to work under what would otherwise be, after all, gentle
compulsion. There would be then less talk about taxing the Natives and
so forth. Natives themselves, used as they are to a very simple mode
of life, will always be able to command enough wages to meet their
wants; and the result will be putting back their progress for an
indefinite length of time. We have used the words 'gentle compulsion'
in the best sense of the term; we mean compulsion of the same kind
that a parent exercises over children
Indian Opinion, 9-7-1903, CWOMG Vol. 3, pg 359-360
CWOMG: COLLECTED WORKS OF MAHATMA GANDHI.
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (13)
On Minority White rule in South Africa:
We, therefore, have no hesitation in agreeing with the view that in
the long run assisted Asiatic immigration into the Transvaal would be
disastrous to the white settlement. People will gradually accommodate
themselves to relying upon Asiatic labour, and any White immigration
of the special class required in the Transvaal on a large scale will
be practically impossible. It would be equally unfair to the Natives
of the soil. It is all very well to say that they would not work, and
that, if the Asiatics were introduced, that would be a stimulus to
work; but human nature is the same everywhere, and once Asiatic labour
is resorted to, there would not be a sustained effort to induce the
Natives to work under what would otherwise be, after all, gentle
compulsion. There would be then less talk about taxing the Natives and
so forth. Natives themselves, used as they are to a very simple mode
of life, will always be able to command enough wages to meet their
wants; and the result will be putting back their progress for an
indefinite length of time. We have used the words 'gentle compulsion'
in the best sense of the term; we mean compulsion of the same kind
that a parent exercises over children
For Beej who is apparently BLIND: Indian Opinion, 9-7-1903, CWOMG Vol.
3, pg 359-360
CWOMG: COLLECTED WORKS OF MAHATMA GANDHI.
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (12)
What the British Indians pray for is very little. They ask for no
political power. They admit the British race should be the dominant
race in South Africa. All they ask for is freedom for those that are
now settled and those that may be allowed to come in future to trade,
to move about, and to hold landed property without any hindrance save
the ordinary legal requirements
Petition to Natal Legislature, CWOMG, vol3, pg 330
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (11)
Ah... and they said Plessey Vs Ferguson was bad...
Well here is Gandhi with his theory of "Separate and Unequal"
...The petition dwells upon "the co-mingling of the Coloured and white
races". May we inform the members of the conference that, so far as
the British Indians are concerned, such a thing is practically
unknown? If there is one thing, which the Indian cherishes more than
any other, it is the purity of type. Why bring such a question into
the controversy at all?
The Transvaal Chambers and British Indians, Indian Opinion 24-12-03,
CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 89
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (10)
More on Gandhi's theory of "separate and unequal"
Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian Location should be
chosen for dumping down all the Kaffirs of the town passes my
comprehension. ...Of course, under my suggestion, The Town Council
must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of
Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly
Indian Opinion, 10-4-04, CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 130-131
Other Gandhian Statements that we need to consider...
'Sanghtan is a really sound movement. Every community is entitled,
indeed bound to organize itself as a seperate entity' : Mahatma Gandhi
(Young India January 6th 1927)
A translation of a Gujrati essay he wrote in 1922 for Niya Jawan
(1) I believe that if Hindu Society has been able to stand it is
because it is founded on the caste system.
(2) The seeds of swaraj are to be found in the caste system. Different
castes are like different sections of miliary division. Each division
is working for the good of the whole....
(3) A community which can create the caste system must be said to
possess unique power of organization.
(4) Caste has a ready made means for spreading primary education. Each
caste can take the responsibility for the education of the children of
the caste. Caste has a political basis. It can work as an electorate
for a representative body. Caste can perform judicial functions by
electing persons to act as judges to decide disputes among members of
the same caste. With castes it is easy to raise a defense force by
requiring each caste to raise a brigade.
(5) I believe that interdining or intermarriage are not necessary for
promoting national unity. That dining together creates friendship is
contrary to experience. If this was true there would have been no war
in Europe.... Taking food is as dirty an act as answering the call of
nature. The only difference is that after answering call of nature we
get peace while after eating food we get discomfort. Just as we
perform the act of answering the call of nature in seclusion so also
the act of taking food must also be done in seclusion.
(6) In India children of brothers do not intermarry. Do they cease to
love because they do not intermarry? Among the Vaishnavas many women
are so orthodox that they will not eat with members of the family nor
will they drink water from a common water pot. Have they no love? The
caste system cannot be said to be bad because it does not allow
interdining or intermarriage between different castes.
(7) Caste is another name for control. Caste puts a limit on
enjoyment. Caste does not allow a person to transgress caste limits in
pursuit of his enjoyment. That is the meaning of such caste
restrictions as interdining and intermarriage.
(8) To destroy caste system and adopt Western European social system
means that Hindus must give up the principle of hereditary occupation
which is the soul of the caste system. Hereditary principle is an
eternal principle. To change it is to create disorder. I have no use
for a Brahmin if I cannot call him a Brahmin for my life. It will be a
chaos if every day a Brahmin is to be changed into a Shudra and a
Shudra is to be changed into a Brahmin.
(9) The caste system is a natural order of society. In India it has
been given a religious coating. Other countries not having understood
the utility of the caste system, it existed only in a loose condition
and consequently those countries have not derived from caste system
the same degree of advantage which India has derived. These being my
views I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the caste
system.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 04:07 am
"The constant need to demean others"How about calling black people subhuman for being black like Adolf Hitler's Indian Twin Gandhi BC did?
On What Gandhi wanted
The last week has been very busy. We have not had a moment's leisure.
We saw Mr. Theodore Morison of Aligarh and the well-known Mr. Stead of
the Review of Reviews. Mr. Stead has boldly come out to give us all
the help he can. He was therefore requested to write to the same Boer
leaders that they should not consider Indians as being on the same
level as Kaffirs
Indian Opinion, 15-12-1906, CWOMG Vol. 6, pg 183
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (3)
CLASSIFICATION OF ASIATICS WITH NATIVES
The cell was situated in the Native quarters and we were housed in one
that was labeled 'For Coloured Debtors'. It was this experience for
which we were perhaps all unprepared. We had fondly imagined that we
would have suitable quarters apart from the Natives. As it was,
perhaps, just as well that we were classed with Natives. We would now
be able to study the life of Native prisoners, their customs and
manners. ...Degradation underlay the classing of Indians with natives.
The Asiatic Act seemed to me to be the summit of our degradation. It
did appear to me, as I think it would appear to any unprejudiced
reader, that it would have been simple humanity if we were given
special quarters. ...the Governor of the gaol tried to make us as
comfortable as he could...But he was powerless to accommodate us
beyond the horrible din and the yells of the Native prisoners
throughout the day and partly at night also. Many of the native
prisoners are only one degree removed from the animal and often
created rows and fought amongst themselves in their cells.
Indian Opinion 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 120
Apart from whether or not this implies degradation, I must say it is
rather dangerous. Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized -- the convicts
even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty, and live almost like
animals. Each ward contains nearly 50 to 60 of them. They often
started rows and fought among themselves. The reader can easily
imagine the plight of the poor Indian thrown into such company
Indian Opinion, 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 135
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (2)
INDIANS ON PAR WITH KAFFIRS
There, our garments were stamped with the letter 'N', which meant that
we were being classed with the Natives. We were all prepared for
hardships, but not quite for this experience. We could understand not
being classed with the whites, but to be placed on the same level with
the Natives seemed too much to put up with. I then felt that Indians
had launched on passive resistance too soon. Here was further proof
that the obnoxious law was intended to emasculate the Indians.
It was, however, as well that we were classified with the Natives. It
was a welcome opportunity to study the treatment meted out to the
Natives, their conditions [of life in the gaol] and their habits.
...We were given a separate ward because we were sentenced to simple
imprisonment; otherwise we would have been in the same ward [with the
Kaffirs]. Indians sentenced to hard labour are in fact kept with the
Kaffirs.
Apart from whether or not this implies degradation, I must say it is
rather dangerous. Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized -- the convicts
even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty, and live almost like
animals. Each ward contains nearly 50 to 60 of them. They often
started rows and fought among themselves. The reader can easily
imagine the plight of the poor Indian thrown into such company
Indian Opinion, 7-3-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 135
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (1)
I have, though, resolved in my mind on an agitation to ensure that
Indian prisoners are not lodged with Kaffirs or others. When I arrived
at the place, there were about 15 Indian prisoners. Except for three,
all of them were satyagrahis. The three were charged with other
offences. These prisoners were generally lodged with kaffirs. When I
reached there, the chief warder issued an order that all of us should
be lodged in a separate room. I observed with regret that some Indians
were happy to sleep in the same room as the Kaffirs, the reason being
that they hoped there for a secret supply of tobacco, etc. This is a
matter of shame to us. We may entertain no aversion to the Kaffirs,
but we cannot ignore the fact that there is no common ground between
them and us in the daily affairs of life. Moreover, those who wish to
sleep in the same room have ulterior motives for doing so.
Obviously, we ought to abandon such notions if we want to make progress.
Indian Opinion, 6-1-1909, CWOMG Vol. 9, pg 149
On What Gandhi wanted (9)
Gandhi's disdain for black people continues:
It is one thing to register Natives who would not work, and whom it is
very difficult to find out if they absent themselves, but it is
another thing and most insulting to expect decent, hard-working, and
respectable Indians, whose only fault is that they work too much, to
have themselves registered
What is a Coolie, Indian Opinion 2151904, CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 193
CWOMG: Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (8)
The whole affair is as much a disgrace to the Indian community as it
is to the British Empire. The British rulers take us to be so lowly
and ignorant that they assume that, like the Kaffirs who can be
pleased with toys and pins, we can also be fobbed off with trinkets
Indian Opinion, 29-2-1908, CWOMG Vol. 8, pg 105
CWOMG: Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (7)
More on SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL theory of Gandhiji...
His Excellency has, moreover, justified the definition of 'coloured
person' on the ground that it is a legacy from the old Government. But
British Indians object to the definition for that very reason. Their
position is this. The ordinances will not in practice apply to them.
The Boer Government insulted the Indians by classing them with the
Kaffirs. Now there is no occasion to perpetuate a needless insult
Indians in the O.R.C, Indian Opinion, 6-1-1906, CWOMG, Vol. 5, pg 177-178
Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi: CWOMG
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (6)
More on SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL theory of Gandhiji...
His Excellency has, moreover, justified the definition of 'coloured
person' on the ground that it is a legacy from the old Government. But
British Indians object to the definition for that very reason. Their
position is this. The ordinances will not in practice apply to them.
The Boer Government insulted the Indians by classing them with the
Kaffirs. Now there is no occasion to perpetuate a needless insult
Indians in the O.R.C, Indian Opinion, 6-1-1906, CWOMG, Vol. 5, pg 177-178
Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi: CWOMG
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (5)
It reduces British Indians to a status lower than that of the
aboriginal races of South Africa and the Coloured people.
Indian Opinion 15-9-1906, CWOMG Vol. 5, pg 419-423
On What Gandhi wanted (14)
On Minority White rule in South Africa:
We, therefore, have no hesitation in agreeing with the view that in
the long run assisted Asiatic immigration into the Transvaal would be
disastrous to the white settlement. People will gradually accommodate
themselves to relying upon Asiatic labour, and any White immigration
of the special class required in the Transvaal on a large scale will
be practically impossible. It would be equally unfair to the Natives
of the soil. It is all very well to say that they would not work, and
that, if the Asiatics were introduced, that would be a stimulus to
work; but human nature is the same everywhere, and once Asiatic labour
is resorted to, there would not be a sustained effort to induce the
Natives to work under what would otherwise be, after all, gentle
compulsion. There would be then less talk about taxing the Natives and
so forth. Natives themselves, used as they are to a very simple mode
of life, will always be able to command enough wages to meet their
wants; and the result will be putting back their progress for an
indefinite length of time. We have used the words 'gentle compulsion'
in the best sense of the term; we mean compulsion of the same kind
that a parent exercises over children
Indian Opinion, 9-7-1903, CWOMG Vol. 3, pg 359-360
CWOMG: COLLECTED WORKS OF MAHATMA GANDHI.
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (13)
On Minority White rule in South Africa:
We, therefore, have no hesitation in agreeing with the view that in
the long run assisted Asiatic immigration into the Transvaal would be
disastrous to the white settlement. People will gradually accommodate
themselves to relying upon Asiatic labour, and any White immigration
of the special class required in the Transvaal on a large scale will
be practically impossible. It would be equally unfair to the Natives
of the soil. It is all very well to say that they would not work, and
that, if the Asiatics were introduced, that would be a stimulus to
work; but human nature is the same everywhere, and once Asiatic labour
is resorted to, there would not be a sustained effort to induce the
Natives to work under what would otherwise be, after all, gentle
compulsion. There would be then less talk about taxing the Natives and
so forth. Natives themselves, used as they are to a very simple mode
of life, will always be able to command enough wages to meet their
wants; and the result will be putting back their progress for an
indefinite length of time. We have used the words 'gentle compulsion'
in the best sense of the term; we mean compulsion of the same kind
that a parent exercises over children
For Beej who is apparently BLIND: Indian Opinion, 9-7-1903, CWOMG Vol.
3, pg 359-360
CWOMG: COLLECTED WORKS OF MAHATMA GANDHI.
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (12)
What the British Indians pray for is very little. They ask for no
political power. They admit the British race should be the dominant
race in South Africa. All they ask for is freedom for those that are
now settled and those that may be allowed to come in future to trade,
to move about, and to hold landed property without any hindrance save
the ordinary legal requirements
Petition to Natal Legislature, CWOMG, vol3, pg 330
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (11)
Ah... and they said Plessey Vs Ferguson was bad...
Well here is Gandhi with his theory of "Separate and Unequal"
...The petition dwells upon "the co-mingling of the Coloured and white
races". May we inform the members of the conference that, so far as
the British Indians are concerned, such a thing is practically
unknown? If there is one thing, which the Indian cherishes more than
any other, it is the purity of type. Why bring such a question into
the controversy at all?
The Transvaal Chambers and British Indians, Indian Opinion 24-12-03,
CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 89
private delete
October 4, 2005
On What Gandhi wanted (10)
More on Gandhi's theory of "separate and unequal"
Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian Location should be
chosen for dumping down all the Kaffirs of the town passes my
comprehension. ...Of course, under my suggestion, The Town Council
must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of
Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly
Indian Opinion, 10-4-04, CWOMG Vol. 4, pg 130-131
Other Gandhian Statements that we need to consider...
'Sanghtan is a really sound movement. Every community is entitled,
indeed bound to organize itself as a seperate entity' : Mahatma Gandhi
(Young India January 6th 1927)
A translation of a Gujrati essay he wrote in 1922 for Niya Jawan
(1) I believe that if Hindu Society has been able to stand it is
because it is founded on the caste system.
(2) The seeds of swaraj are to be found in the caste system. Different
castes are like different sections of miliary division. Each division
is working for the good of the whole....
(3) A community which can create the caste system must be said to
possess unique power of organization.
(4) Caste has a ready made means for spreading primary education. Each
caste can take the responsibility for the education of the children of
the caste. Caste has a political basis. It can work as an electorate
for a representative body. Caste can perform judicial functions by
electing persons to act as judges to decide disputes among members of
the same caste. With castes it is easy to raise a defense force by
requiring each caste to raise a brigade.
(5) I believe that interdining or intermarriage are not necessary for
promoting national unity. That dining together creates friendship is
contrary to experience. If this was true there would have been no war
in Europe.... Taking food is as dirty an act as answering the call of
nature. The only difference is that after answering call of nature we
get peace while after eating food we get discomfort. Just as we
perform the act of answering the call of nature in seclusion so also
the act of taking food must also be done in seclusion.
(6) In India children of brothers do not intermarry. Do they cease to
love because they do not intermarry? Among the Vaishnavas many women
are so orthodox that they will not eat with members of the family nor
will they drink water from a common water pot. Have they no love? The
caste system cannot be said to be bad because it does not allow
interdining or intermarriage between different castes.
(7) Caste is another name for control. Caste puts a limit on
enjoyment. Caste does not allow a person to transgress caste limits in
pursuit of his enjoyment. That is the meaning of such caste
restrictions as interdining and intermarriage.
(8) To destroy caste system and adopt Western European social system
means that Hindus must give up the principle of hereditary occupation
which is the soul of the caste system. Hereditary principle is an
eternal principle. To change it is to create disorder. I have no use
for a Brahmin if I cannot call him a Brahmin for my life. It will be a
chaos if every day a Brahmin is to be changed into a Shudra and a
Shudra is to be changed into a Brahmin.
(9) The caste system is a natural order of society. In India it has
been given a religious coating. Other countries not having understood
the utility of the caste system, it existed only in a loose condition
and consequently those countries have not derived from caste system
the same degree of advantage which India has derived. These being my
views I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the caste
system.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Prepare for a stinging one... here it comes... chmaaat!
http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/jun/13spec1.htm
June 13, 2005
As the country is plunged into an acrimonious debate on Mohammad Ali Jinnah's secular credentials, a trust in Mumbai named after the founder of Pakistan is busy helping poor students of all creeds.
Welcome to the Jinnah Hall Trust.
Sitting in his small cubicle at The People's Jinnah Hall at Grant Road in south Mumbai, Nayan Yagnik, a trustee of the Jinnah Hall Trust, does not want to comment on whether Bharatiya Janata Party chief Lal Kishenchand Advani was right when he praised Jinnah's secular credentials recently in Pakistan. He does not comment either on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's attack on Advani. He has no views on the RSS' Akhand Bharat Theory -- a line of thinking that seeks to reverse bloody Partition.
Yagnik is thinking of the days ahead. He has his job cut out. A new educational year is staring him in the face. What it means for him is a flood of applications for scholarships. The applications will have to be screened and deserving students would have to be awarded assistance. Deserving students, mind you -- not deserving Hindu students, not deserving Muslim students, not deserving Christian students.
Complete Coverage: The BJP Crisis
The Jinnah Hall Trust, as the name suggests, also controls a community hall that is let out for cultural and family functions for a small price. It is let out to political parties too and parties of all hues, including the Shiv Sena and BJP, have used the hall.
Though the trust calls it The People's Jinnah Hall, political parties refer to it as just The People's Hall on the invitation cards.
Attempts were made by the Sena and BJP to pressure trustees to rename the trust. Yagnik, a Gujarati, and other trustees, none of them a Muslim, refused.
How this hall got its name is an interesting story.
Also see: Advani's popularity soars in Pak
It was 1918. Lord Willingdon was relinquishing the governorship of Bombay province and a meeting was convened to appreciate his services. Jinnah did not approve of the idea and decided to organise a protest. He along with his wife Ratanbai and a large number of protestors were forceably removed by the police.
The episode made Jinnah a hero and within a few days his admirers, mostly Congress workers, contributed Rs 30,000 in his honour.
The amount was presented to him at a felicitation ceremony at a small hall at Congress House. However, Jinnah, one of the most successful barristers in the city, returned the money.
The Congressmen then named the hall after him and set up a trust with the Rs 30,000. It was called the Jinnah Hall Trust.
Yagnik says it is a small trust with annual earnings of less than Rs 100,000. Nobody from Jinnah's family has ever been involved in the trust though Nusli Wadia, Jinnah's grandson and chairman of the Bombay Dyeing [Get Quote] group, lives in Mumbai.
"Sometime ago the Pakistan government had wanted to set up their temporary visa office here, but we said no. We don't want to make it a diplomatic or political issue," Yagnik said.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 03:38 am
Guru,Prepare for a stinging one... here it comes... chmaaat!
http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/jun/13spec1.htm
June 13, 2005
As the country is plunged into an acrimonious debate on Mohammad Ali Jinnah's secular credentials, a trust in Mumbai named after the founder of Pakistan is busy helping poor students of all creeds.
Welcome to the Jinnah Hall Trust.
Sitting in his small cubicle at The People's Jinnah Hall at Grant Road in south Mumbai, Nayan Yagnik, a trustee of the Jinnah Hall Trust, does not want to comment on whether Bharatiya Janata Party chief Lal Kishenchand Advani was right when he praised Jinnah's secular credentials recently in Pakistan. He does not comment either on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's attack on Advani. He has no views on the RSS' Akhand Bharat Theory -- a line of thinking that seeks to reverse bloody Partition.
Yagnik is thinking of the days ahead. He has his job cut out. A new educational year is staring him in the face. What it means for him is a flood of applications for scholarships. The applications will have to be screened and deserving students would have to be awarded assistance. Deserving students, mind you -- not deserving Hindu students, not deserving Muslim students, not deserving Christian students.
Complete Coverage: The BJP Crisis
The Jinnah Hall Trust, as the name suggests, also controls a community hall that is let out for cultural and family functions for a small price. It is let out to political parties too and parties of all hues, including the Shiv Sena and BJP, have used the hall.
Though the trust calls it The People's Jinnah Hall, political parties refer to it as just The People's Hall on the invitation cards.
Attempts were made by the Sena and BJP to pressure trustees to rename the trust. Yagnik, a Gujarati, and other trustees, none of them a Muslim, refused.
How this hall got its name is an interesting story.
Also see: Advani's popularity soars in Pak
It was 1918. Lord Willingdon was relinquishing the governorship of Bombay province and a meeting was convened to appreciate his services. Jinnah did not approve of the idea and decided to organise a protest. He along with his wife Ratanbai and a large number of protestors were forceably removed by the police.
The episode made Jinnah a hero and within a few days his admirers, mostly Congress workers, contributed Rs 30,000 in his honour.
The amount was presented to him at a felicitation ceremony at a small hall at Congress House. However, Jinnah, one of the most successful barristers in the city, returned the money.
The Congressmen then named the hall after him and set up a trust with the Rs 30,000. It was called the Jinnah Hall Trust.
Yagnik says it is a small trust with annual earnings of less than Rs 100,000. Nobody from Jinnah's family has ever been involved in the trust though Nusli Wadia, Jinnah's grandson and chairman of the Bombay Dyeing [Get Quote] group, lives in Mumbai.
"Sometime ago the Pakistan government had wanted to set up their temporary visa office here, but we said no. We don't want to make it a diplomatic or political issue," Yagnik said.
Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis
Jinnah participated in a fair share of marches during his time in the Congress Party and the Home Rule League and also as an independent... most famous one of which was the protest against Simon Commission which had no Indian ..
Unlike Gandhi's sojourn in Aga Khan's palace... Jinnah was on one occasion beaten up and injured by the police ... but he stood his ground and the citizens of Bombay built and dedicated a hall to him called "People's Jinnah Hall" ... which is still there in Bombay. He was never opposed to protest marches ... but he was against Mahatmafying them.
Also as Jinnah's true follower and a Pakistani, I participated in the Long March on Friday... after I spoke to BBC live at 12 noon. Now BBC is not stupid because it calls me of all people to speak on behalf of the Lawyers' Movement.
Now I am done talking to champions of diahorrea on chowk and I bid you farewell.
-YLH
PS: Great article. Just shows that what I have been saying is now gaining acceptance because it is the truth.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 17, 2008 01:44 am
I don't like arguing with third rate people who have probably not stepped out of their office space and no even less of history... but facts must be stated. Jinnah participated in a fair share of marches during his time in the Congress Party and the Home Rule League and also as an independent... most famous one of which was the protest against Simon Commission which had no Indian ..
Unlike Gandhi's sojourn in Aga Khan's palace... Jinnah was on one occasion beaten up and injured by the police ... but he stood his ground and the citizens of Bombay built and dedicated a hall to him called "People's Jinnah Hall" ... which is still there in Bombay. He was never opposed to protest marches ... but he was against Mahatmafying them.
Also as Jinnah's true follower and a Pakistani, I participated in the Long March on Friday... after I spoke to BBC live at 12 noon. Now BBC is not stupid because it calls me of all people to speak on behalf of the Lawyers' Movement.
Now I am done talking to champions of diahorrea on chowk and I bid you farewell.
-YLH
PS: Great article. Just shows that what I have been saying is now gaining acceptance because it is the truth.
Twenty Three Students Expelled From Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 11, 2008 06:00 pm
Well said sir. 192.
Twenty Three Students Expelled From Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 11, 2008 05:58 pm
Abu abdullah is probably a sunni-troll trying to give Ahmadis a bad name.
Twenty Three Students Expelled From Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad
What you consider Ahmadis is your business but it is the question of what Ahmadis consider themselves...
They consider themselves Muslims... And they were considered Muslim when Pakistan laid a claim to Qadian as a "Muslim holy place" as a counter weight to Sikh holy places in Pakistan ... and even Muslim when Bhutto travelled to Rabwah many times... once in my father's car.
So then it doesn't matter one agrees with them or not but they should have the right to profess their Islam unfettered.
So you can call them followers of dajjal or whatever (to me the real dajjals are sitting in deoband passing out those horrible fatwas under the "secular" indian govt's protection and the Pir of Golra preaching superstition and backwardness mack in the middle of Pakistan's capital) that is your prerogative. Leave it to god to make the final decision...don't put words in his mouth. Poor god sahab has been abused by witchdoctors of all kinds enough already.
Posted by
MantoLives
Jun 11, 2008 05:56 pm
Naqshu,What you consider Ahmadis is your business but it is the question of what Ahmadis consider themselves...
They consider themselves Muslims... And they were considered Muslim when Pakistan laid a claim to Qadian as a "Muslim holy place" as a counter weight to Sikh holy places in Pakistan ... and even Muslim when Bhutto travelled to Rabwah many times... once in my father's car.
So then it doesn't matter one agrees with them or not but they should have the right to profess their Islam unfettered.
So you can call them followers of dajjal or whatever (to me the real dajjals are sitting in deoband passing out those horrible fatwas under the "secular" indian govt's protection and the Pir of Golra preaching superstition and backwardness mack in the middle of Pakistan's capital) that is your prerogative. Leave it to god to make the final decision...don't put words in his mouth. Poor god sahab has been abused by witchdoctors of all kinds enough already.
- MantoLives
- Interacts: 8928
- iLogs: 1034
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 150719
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Jul 25 2003
- Last signin: Oct 14 2009
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


