Of Medical Students, Passports and Religous Tolerance masadi,

what about the 'rage' part? The 'impotent rage' seems like your oRhnaa bichona, no?

Is this the same trick as saying 'gnight' and 'this is my last post' but not really? Are these just words.. and why do you say them in the first place? Do you realize how flimsy you sound?

Of Medical Students, Passports and Religous Tolerance '#349 Posted by masadi on July 21, 2008 9:49:24 am
g'night, and may the censorers and others that are mortally afraid of the truth perish in their inadequacies and their impotent rage.......'

masadi,

This may seem naughty to point out... but 'impotent' people are censoring your articles and whatnot (conclusionL they are not impotent). Are you losing your mind.. and just projecting your mental state on them?

Freud and Jung and Their Secret Affairs This story could have been written in seraiki to convey the intended pathos and childlike gossip.. instead of dressing up in a suit boot of thoughful insights.

Were Buddhists and Jains Persecuted in Ancient India? '#104 Posted by Urstruly on May 28, 2008 1:50:37 pm

There is only one religion in this world that saves human beings from any infinte loops,'

The keyword here is 'SAVE'. Urstruly and the rest of the believers are really afraid of understanding and exploring and being confounded. They just want their women, control over cattle, oil and resources. They want to control trade routes and the Suez canal. The best model to presuade everyone else of the status quo is a singularity, the Prime Mover. It is highly utilitarian and ultimately a fabrication.

Fatima Bhutto Fighting for Justice Brother masadi,

How hard is it to access the original sources to write either one of these articles? Even you can write one without having read either one of these articles BUT END UP USING SIMILAR WORDS AND NARRATIVE.

You and HP want to say something significant.. but there is nothing here. Sorry.. you two are medriocre

PS. Brother, what is this okla nick saying on UP about your circumstances in the pinD State University where you worked. kaka thought you were a high faluting scholar but seems like chowk staff is right about you. Kindly explain in 3 distinct posts, as the revelation come to you in stages.

Fatima Bhutto Fighting for Justice Good detective work, HP genius... but in recounting of factual events as well as actual conversations of recent past.. the sources of both articles can be the same 'zardarai cook'.

Nice crying plagirism-wolf.. Now try again.

Whither Enlightened Moderation The only justice for the religionist/racist basis of Pakistan is to disintegrate it into religiious and racist territories and then bomb it into a parking lot for India..

The Wrong Mix This article is replete with factual inaccuracies, typically committed by a moron who wants to write a 'research' artcle using his imagination.

So ZAB was inluenced by the 'Arab Socialism' in the Middle East?! WTF?!!

Paracha wouldn't know research even if he renamed his dildo with it.

Persecution of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries '(The issue with hateful comment is that ... it is based upon lies. But I'd rather hear from SAlim first to make sure I did not misunderstand.)'

Why are hateful comments based on lies, an issue? Because it concerns Mirza?

Persecution of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries '(Now tell me … was it you or someone else who recently made hateful comments about the death of Mirza Sahib. I thought it was you … but I could have been mistaken).'

What is wrong with making hateful comments about the death of Mirza Sahib? Is it the same thing as making hateful comments about PBUH?

About Jihad, what do you make of Mirza's views about Jihad as copy n pasted by Echoboom here?

Persecution of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries Don't tell kaka the test is to fight a dau Takay ka prophet. The test is to fight the urge to incite oppression and hate..

y is this cleat to a muslim-atheist like kaka?

Persecution of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries Insaaniyat people!

Even if there is an Allah, will He not forgive for succumbing to the libratarian ideals of let live? What is this greed to control the affairs of this world, Echoboom! Let the Palestine/Mirzai/Israeli fitnah take over this world. Isn't this world but a test.

What if you are wrong about the heavy handed approach to fitnah? kuch tau Allah kaa khauf karo. kaka is sad..

When a Knock at the Door is Not Enough bj,

u r an idiot not to mention thorough chutya. read the quote about who the 'brave' women are supposed to be..

When a Knock at the Door is Not Enough First, 'when a knock ON the door is...' is better.

Second..., kaka is confused about whether you lived on the floor above the characters or adjacent to them..

Third..

'One needs to break these walls and protect these brave women to be truly empowered by being mobile'

Why are these women 'brave'? Is lionizing the people you pretend to side with, the only way to feel anything for them? What happens if these women are not 'brave'? Will you still write about them?

What Does Negative Campaigning Really Mean? Let's look at it from the focus of power hungry. kaka is interested in pointing those out. Though it is possible for some power hungry to pass the negative campaigning test, any CANDIDATE who inches towards the negative end of the campaigning spectrum is correlated with power hunger.

rahul, u r continously falling into the trap of the legitimacy of personal/background investigation by non-candidates. Even though kaka can claim that a certain candidate was a victim of negative attacks (lost/won elections is another matter) by the press, vested interests, the Pope or whatever, it does not mean IT IS UNJUSTIFIABLE to engage in negative campaigning. In fact, kaka would agree that it is most legitimate. Obviously in the case of non-candidates, the question of power hunger does not arise. In the case of a candidate who is doing negative campaigning.. all kaka is saying that s/he is power hungry. Having said that there is nothing wrong with being power hungry. It is what it is.

What Does Negative Campaigning Really Mean? Here is the gist one more time..

People can go ahead and consider whatever they want to and elect whoever they want to. All of it is justifiable and whatnot.

kaka now is laying forth a (new?) spectrum: one extreme is Bono and the other is Nixon in the 50's or similar. kaka is not even saying that one is better than the other. And kaka is certainly not saying that in order to be elected, you should do the Bono act (this lays to rest HP's paranoa about how politics NEED be).

So what is the most un-Bono like thing to do? It is to attack the candidate.. not in terms of positions and ideas but persona (past, present & future) like marital status, # of divorces, sexual orientation, friendship with and admiration of Hitler's cooking (now if the candidate's position about race relation is whacked, then that can be criticised). Please note that regardless of what our negative campaigner does, people have the right to reject someone based on the size of the nose.

kulharee brought up a new point that the campaign staff (or outside the campaign vested interests) runs things without candidates permission. This is a classic place to point out is ALL KAKA IS INTERESTED IN IS LABELLING A CERTAIN CANDIDATE AND CAMPAIGN AS NEGATIVE OR NOT NEGATIVE. It really doesn't matter if the candidate signed up for it. The only extra corollory kaka is adding is that the closer you are to the negative spectrum, the more power hungry your are. There is nothing wrong with that either. And you can also be a power hungry, without having failed the Bono test.

This is the thesis kaka would like chanllenged.