unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Unplugged Home
  • Books Movies Music
  • News Sports Biz
  • Off-the-wall
  • Chowk Connect!
  • Chowk related topics

so..cliftonbridge...roses ARE red


POST REPLY
read replies 22

so..cliftonbridge...roses ARE red

Topic started by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 7:45:43 am

and the jihadis you create ARE the ones killing you...

and considering the fact that your government/army are letting the jihadis operate openly, any loss of "innocent" life is no worse than the german citizens who died when the allies bombed dresden...

AP IMPACT: Pakistan militants focus on Afghanistan



By KATHY GANNON, Associated Press Writer Sun Jul 13, 4:14 PM ET

RAWALPINDI, Pakistan - In early June, about 300 fighters from jihadist groups came together for a secret gathering here, in the same city that serves as headquarters to the Pakistani army.

The groups were launched long ago with the army's clandestine support to fight against India in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. But at the meeting, they agreed to resolve their differences and commit more fighters to another front instead: Afghanistan.


"The message was that the jihad in Kashmir is still continuing but it is not the most important right now. Afghanistan is the fighting ground, against the Americans there," said Toor Gul, a leader of the militant group Hezb-ul Mujahedeen. The groups included the al-Qaida-linked Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, banned by Pakistan and branded terrorists by the U.S., he said.

The U.S. military says militant attacks in eastern Afghanistan have increased 40 percent this year over 2007. And for two straight months, the death toll of foreign troops in Afghanistan has exceeded that of Iraq. On Sunday, nine U.S. soldiers were killed in an ambush in Afghanistan's eastern Kunar province, the deadliest single attack for the U.S. since June 2005.

Pakistani military and European intelligence officials, speaking to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the information is sensitive, confirmed the June meeting and said it was the second such gathering this year. A senior military official described the inability to prevent the meetings as "an intelligence failure."

Despite growing pressure on Pakistan to quell Islamic militancy, jihadist groups within its borders are in fact increasing their cooperation to attack U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, according to interviews with a wide range of militants, intelligence officials, and military officers.

Militants say they operate with minimal interference, and sometimes tacit cooperation, from Pakistani authorities, while diplomats say the country's new government has until now been ineffectual in dealing with a looming threat.

"Where there were embers seven years ago we are now fighting flames," a serving Western general told The Associated Press, referring to both Afghanistan and Pakistan's border regions. He agreed to be interviewed on condition his identity and nationality were not revealed.

A Pentagon report released late last month described a dual terror threat in Afghanistan: the Taliban in the south, and "a more complex, adaptive insurgency" in the east. That fragmented insurgency is made up of groups ranging from al-Qaida-linked Afghan warlords such as Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's radical Hezb-i-Islami group to Pakistani militants such as Jaish-e-Mohammed, the report said.

Hekmatyar's is the strongest rebel group in Afghanistan's Kunar province, where Sunday's deadly ambush occurred. His group has also had close contacts with jihadi groups in Pakistan.

In the past, the Taliban were suspicious of the mujahadeen groups with close associations to the Pakistani military and intelligence. But now Gul, who fights alongside Hekmatyar's men in Kunar province, said they are united in the fight for Afghanistan. He told the AP he had been to Kunar in the last two months but refused to be more specific.

Mark Laity, NATO spokesman in Afghanistan, said Pakistan's new civilian government has reduced its preventive military action and is trying to negotiate peace deals with the militants. He expressed concern that the deals were leading to "increased cross border activity."

The Pakistani government also appears to be loosening its grip on the volatile northwest, where the influence of Islamic extremists is expanding. Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden is believed to be hiding somewhere along the rugged, lawless Afghan-Pakistan border.

Pakistan's Mohmand and Bajaur tribal areas are emerging as increasingly strong insurgent centers, according to Gul, the militant. His information was corroborated by Pakistani and Western officials. Both those tribal areas are right next door to Afghanistan's Kunar province.

"Before there were special, hidden places for training. But now they are all over Bajaur and Mohmand," he said. "Even in houses there is training going on."

A former minister in President Pervez Musharraf's ousted government, who did not want to be identified for fear of reprisals, said insurgents were being paid between 6,000 and 8,000 rupees — the equivalent of $90 and $120 — a month in Mohmand and grain was being collected to feed them. He did not identify the source of the donations but said Pakistan's army and intelligence were aware of them.

Maulvi Abdul Rahman, a Taliban militant and former police officer under the ousted hardline regime, said jihadist sympathizers in the Middle East are sending money to support the insurgents and more Central Asians are coming to fight. Rahman said under a tacit understanding with authorities, militants were free to cross to fight in Afghanistan so long as they do not stage attacks inside Pakistan, which has been assailed by an unprecedented wave of suicide attacks in the past year.

"It is easy for me now. I just go and come. There are army checkposts and now we pass and they don't say anything. Pakistan now understands that the U.S. is dangerous for them," he said. "There is not an article in any agreement that says go to Afghanistan, but it is understood if we want to go to Afghanistan, OK, but leave Pakistan alone.'"

The Taliban appears to have considerable latitude to operate. Last month Baitullah Mehsud, the chief Pakistani Taliban leader, held a news conference attended by dozens of Pakistani journalists in South Waziristan tribal region. Authorities did nothing to stop it, although the Pakistani government and the CIA have accused Mehsud of plotting the December assassination of former premier Benazir Bhutto.

Journalists who attended said there were no security forces to be seen as a convoy of as many as 20 vehicles passed into the Mehsud's hideout — not far from where the army itself had taken an entourage of foreign journalists just a week earlier.

Tensions in Pakistan's anti-terror alliance with the United States are growing. U.S. airstrikes during a border clash with militants on June 10 killed 11 Pakistani paramilitary troops — the deadliest incident of its kind, prompting a sharp rebuke by Pakistan's army to Washington.

Pakistan's army vehemently denies giving covert aid to militants and points out that 1,087 of its soldiers have died in the tribal regions since 2002 — more than the U.S. military and NATO have lost in Afghanistan.

"If anyone says the army is providing sanctuary, nothing could be further from the truth," army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas said. He criticized the U.S. and NATO forces for failing to capture insurgents when they cross into Afghanistan or stop them from coming into Pakistan.

"Is it the responsibility of only one side to stop the border crossings?" he asked.

A senior government official also said Pakistan — which once backed the Taliban but formally abandoned its support after the Sept. 11 attacks on America — has become the scapegoat for U.S. and NATO failures in Afghanistan.

"They don't want to tell their bosses that they've made a mess of it in Afghanistan, where there is no governance, corruption is everywhere and the Afghan government is involved up to the hilt in heroin smuggling, gun running," said the official, who had the authority to speak only if his name was not used. He denied the army was helping militants.

"Maybe one or two individuals are allowing things to happen, but as a policy it makes no sense to me. Just because we were in bed with them once doesn't mean we are today."

However, the Afghan government has directly accused Pakistani intelligence of plotting a recent assassination attempt on President Hamid Karzai and the July 7 bombing outside the Indian Embassy in Kabul that killed at least 58 people.

Such allegations are virtually impossible to substantiate. But retired Pakistani general Talat Masood said the army still treats militants and Afghan rebels as "assets" because of its deep conviction that India is expanding its influence in Afghanistan and using its consulates there to foment an ethnic rebellion in Pakistan's troubled southwest Baluchistan province.

"There are certain (militant) groups that have the full blessing of the army, some to which they are neutral and some they are against," he said.

Although Pakistan has received some $10 billion in mostly military aid since 2001, the army mistrusts the United States — worried it could one day abandon Pakistan and even turn its guns on a country where it has repeatedly voiced concern that al-Qaida's leadership is regrouping.

"They still believe in the same thing — that America will leave them tomorrow," Masood said. "And we'll be left high and dry with India strong, and a hostile government in Afghanistan and that we will have no friends."


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-16 of 22
listing 1-16   1 2
Post by nb on Jul 14, 2008 7:46:38 pm

how about all the chowkies who kept saying yes it's sad that indians died but look for the root cause*-)


flag objectionable content
Post by jang on Jul 14, 2008 11:12:26 am

yar edgy its not about right or wrong, but which side you are on. when jihadis spread their propaganda, "you" shed tears and empty your pockets and state-coffers for chanda, when arjun posts pics of jihadis cutting heads, you protest..its kinda confusing :?

"you" is off course a metaphoric you


flag objectionable content
Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 11:08:31 am

Two (wrongs) grotesque acts don't make it right. Both
are sick, fanatical people.

=====

Post by jang on Jul 14, 2008 10:46:32 am

edgy yar, its ok to post picture. a large amount of jihadi apparatus is dedicated to creating pictures, videos and embellishing stories so that the chanda keeps flowing


flag objectionable content
Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 11:06:42 am

You fanatical support for killing innocent women and children
to achieve your military objective (shouldn't be a surprise
when you posted pics of mutiliated humans) is repugnant
to say the least. This is a war crime. History will not
judge war criminals kindly.

Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 9:42:16 am

nb: I don't feel sorry for the dead innocents. If there were a way to whack the jihadis without affecting people who truly never supported jihad in any way shape or form, i'd be all for it..

OTOH, I won't be losing any sleep over collateral damage..


flag objectionable content
Post by jang on Jul 14, 2008 10:46:32 am

edgy yar, its ok to post picture. a large amount of jihadi apparatus is dedicated to creating pictures, videos and embellishing stories so that the chanda keeps flowing


flag objectionable content
Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 10:43:03 am

If you have to ask that question, than I suggest you
reacquaint yourself with humanity and spend less
time wallowing in hatred. (T)

=====

Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 10:26:28 am

"Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:52:04 am


Anyone who had any decency would'nt have posted
those pictures."


Who made that rule?


flag objectionable content
Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 10:29:17 am


did i write any poems


yeah...writing a "poem" to illustrate the point is BAD BAD BAD..

denying that the jihadis exist and making all sorts of excuses for the paki state creating them is fine as long as you don't write any "poems"


flag objectionable content
Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 10:26:28 am

Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:52:04 am


Anyone who had any decency would'nt have posted
those pictures.


Who made that rule?


You are so blinded by your hatred
for muslims and pakistanis


that's right...pointing out that pakis are being killed by the jihadis they created is hatred of muslims in general and allah's chosen muslims in particular..


Now, for somone who gets irate over mind reading skills,
you make awful lot of assumptions about people.


yeah...where do I get off making the claim that pakiland and paks supported the jihadis...

it's not like pakis covered for the jihadis by claiming they were freedom fighters who only targeted armed combatants...and it's not like jihadis were operating openly in the land of the pure and having no trouble in filling up their chanda boxes...


flag objectionable content
Post by mohar11 on Jul 14, 2008 10:20:39 am

same old randi rona(thx stuka)... :D:D


flag objectionable content
Post by cliftonbridge on Jul 14, 2008 10:07:59 am

"let me put it this way...I feel about the dead innocents as much as cliftonbridge and others care about dead indian civilians killed by the jihadis..."


huh? did cliftonbridge ever gloat about dead indian soldiers much less dead civilians? did i write any poems? sure i could be anyone, just as you could be anyone ... but we are talking about things you have already done which i certainly have not [-X


flag objectionable content
Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:52:04 am

Anyone who had any decency would'nt have posted
those pictures. You are so blinded by your hatred
for muslims and pakistanis that you'd choose any
means necessary to spread your filth.

Now, for somone who gets irate over mind reading skills,
you make awful lot of assumptions about people.

You can't hide your hatred.

Like I said, I'll have a rational discussion with you
about the article you posted if you don't act like
Limbaugh.

=====

Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 9:44:37 am

calm down...

how do you know I posted the pictured with glee?

I posted a "glee" icon?
you can read my mind?

what's happening to you and people like you is you don't like the obvious conclusion - that the jihadis you created are killing you - and you're just lashing out at the threads I opened..


flag objectionable content
Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 9:44:37 am

Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:39:31 am


you posed pictures with glee



calm down...

how do you know I posted the pictured with glee?

I posted a "glee" icon?
you can read my mind?

what's happening to you and people like you is you don't like the obvious conclusion - that the jihadis you created are killing you - and you're just lashing out at the threads I opened..


flag objectionable content
Post by _arjun11 on Jul 14, 2008 9:42:16 am

nb: I don't feel sorry for the dead innocents. If there were a way to whack the jihadis without affecting people who truly never supported jihad in any way shape or form, i'd be all for it..

OTOH, I won't be losing any sleep over collateral damage..

let me put it this way...I feel about the dead innocents as much as cliftonbridge and others care about dead indian civilians killed by the jihadis...

so if cliftonbridge thinks the paki jihadis didn't kill a whole bunch of indian civilians...


flag objectionable content
Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:39:31 am

I never said that. There is no need to get emotional here.

Your hatred filter is obscuring some glaring realities
of life down there. You can type away wishing that
all your fantasies will come true but real life is more
complex. If you won't think, you'll make same old
mistakes again. It's that simple.

You just want to see many Pakistanis and muslims dead
(you posed pictures with glee) because you hate them.
Instead of being hateful and angry, think clearly [-X
and tell us about the ground realities. I promise you
that if you don't post anything like Rush Limbaugh, I'll
happily have a discussion with you. If you sound like
Limbaugh again, I'll just ignore you.

Ok.

=====

Post by edgeNRidge on Jul 14, 2008 9:06:13 am

yeah...lets exonerate pakiland based on what the paki official is saying...

hey mullen...call back the special forces and the predators...pakiland says they're pure and innocent as the wind driven snow..

nice try but no cigar...it's self-delusional thinking like this that leads to shock when the hellfires drop...


flag objectionable content
Post by cliftonbridge on Jul 14, 2008 9:36:15 am

"First of all I am not gloating over the civilian deaths..like i said, if it was possible for a missile to seek out the jihadis or their supporters, that would be good"

ok. If you say you are against gloating over the deaths of innocent people ill believe you, though you certainly come off as someone who does.

As for the other stuff, its immaterial what happened in dresden kashmir or afghanistan. Most civilian individuals who died had no say in that, they just lived in a world where it happened.


flag objectionable content
Post by nb on Jul 14, 2008 9:36:13 am

arjun, i feel sorry for the germans who died in dresden..yes, i know if they'd lived, the war would have ended differently*-) but you can still feel for them.

no way around the fact that it's the same groups that pakistanis funded that are killing them..people never learn, they never think it will come home to bite them...much like rajiv and the ltte8-|
he brought it on himself and many others,but his death was sad too.


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-16 of 22
listing 1-16   1 2

Latest Interacts

  • rahul_capri: "Given that our system... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • ElectricSheep: Re: # 122 You will... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • dost_mittar: ElectricSheep: Could you tell us... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • ElectricSheep: Re: # 117 "I find... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • mohar11: sadna Delhi police or any... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • dost_mittar: tahmed32: I am a solution-oriented... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • tahmed32: hamidm #116 its all... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • tahmed32: Dost Mittar: In other... ‘Dustbin of history’ or

Latest iLogs

  • quin 09:44 am
    forever Ghalib - for Fatima Ijaz, the great poetess and aspirant of Chowk editorship
  • cyclone 08:48 am
    Moreen, WTF?
  • MeiraJ08 08:07 am
    Feminism hits the blues: The Red Light Girl
  • MeiraJ08 07:37 am
    Feminist Poems Series: [thE nEw wOmAn waLks In WaVeS] [Neo-Mermaidism]
  • MeiraJ08 07:17 am
    there are two \'men\' here that can spread nausea quicker than gun-fire by the taliban suicide community....
  • dawa-i-dil 06:29 am
    MIT Chick..we r proud of u
  • quin 05:16 am
    "A Heart Replete With Thankfulness”
  • ijaz_gul 01:06 am
    Zaid Hamid of Brass Tacks
  • MeiraJ08 08:39 pm
    swig: urdu.
  • MeiraJ08 04:25 pm
    the blues in urdu II -------- shama hai koyee musafir nahin
  • MeiraJ08 03:58 pm
    the blues in urdu --- i must try the style first....
  • Salim_Chauhan 01:48 pm
    The Nigerians have hacked Chowk\'s PM system
more »

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited